首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Comparison of the efficacy of posterior-anterior screws, anterior-posterior screws and a posterior-anterior plate in the fixation of posterior malleolar fractures with a fragment size of?≥?15 and??15%
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy of posterior-anterior screws, anterior-posterior screws and a posterior-anterior plate in the fixation of posterior malleolar fractures with a fragment size of?≥?15 and??15%

机译:后侧螺钉,前后螺钉和后侧板在后畸形骨折固定中的效果的比较α≤15的片段尺寸和α≤15和?<?15%

获取原文
           

摘要

Different fixation methods have been used to treat posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs), but the clinical efficacy of different fixation methods in the treatment of PMF with different fragmentation has rarely been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) screws and PA plate in the fixation of PMFs with a fragment size of ≥15 and 0.05). In fragment size 0.05). For PMFs with fragment size ≥15%, there was no significant difference in the outcomes between the three fixation methods. For PMF with fragmentation ?15%, the PA and AP screws both provided good fixation.
机译:已经使用不同的固定方法来治疗畸形骨折(PMF),但很少报道不同固定方法在治疗PMF中具有不同碎裂的临床疗效。本研究的目的是研究后部(PA),前后(AP)螺钉和PA板在PMF的固定中的疗效,片段尺寸≥15和0.05)。在片段大小0.05)。对于碎片大小≥15%的PMF,三种固定方法之间的结果没有显着差异。对于PMF的碎片<?15%,PA和AP螺钉都提供了良好的固定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号