首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Screw fixation of ACPHT acetabular fractures offers sufficient biomechanical stability when compared to standard buttress plate fixation
【24h】

Screw fixation of ACPHT acetabular fractures offers sufficient biomechanical stability when compared to standard buttress plate fixation

机译:与标准支撑板固定相比,ACPHT髋臼骨折的螺钉固定提供足够的生物力学稳定性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Geriatric acetabular fractures require fixation with sufficient primary stability to allow for immediate full-weight bearing. Minimally-invasive procedures would be desirable in order to keep perioperative morbidity low. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical strength of lag screw-only fixation of anterior column posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) acetabular fractures to standard anatomical plate fixation. Standardized ACPHT fractures were created in fourth generation synthetic pelvis models and stabilized by either an anatomical buttress plate (n?=?4) or by a screw-only construct (n?=?4). In a validated setup, a cyclic loading protocol was applied with increasing axial force (3200?cycles, 175?N to 2250?N). Construct survival, acetabular fracture motion, and mode of failure were assessed. The median number of cycles needed until failure of the construct occurred was 2304?cycles (range, 2020 to 2675) in the plate fixation group and 3200?cycles (range, 3101 to 3200) for the screw fixation constructs (p?=?.003). With regard to energy absorbed until failure, the plate fixation group resisted to 1.57?×?106?N*cycles (range, 1.21?×?106 to 2.14?×?106) and the screw fixation group to 3.17?×?106?N*cycles (range, 2.92?×?106 to 3.17?×?106?0.1). In this in vitro biomechanical study, screw-only fixation of an ACPHT acetabular fracture resulted in at least as good construct survival as seen for standard buttress plate fixation. Both methods resisted sufficiently to forces that would be expected under physiologic conditions.
机译:老年髋臼骨折需要具有足够初级稳定性的固定,以允许立即的全重轴承。为了保持围手术期发病率低,将需要微创手术。本研究的目的是将滞后螺钉的生物力学强度与前柱后半横向(ACPHT)髋臼骨折的生物力学强度与标准解剖板固定进行比较。在第四代合成骨盆模型中产生标准化的ACPHT骨折,并通过解剖支撑板(n?=Δ4)或仅通过螺钉构建体稳定(n?=Δ4)。在验证的设置中,循环加载协议随着轴向力的增加(3200?循环,175Ω·N至2250?n)。构建生存期,髋臼骨折运动和失败模式进行了评估。所需的循环中所需的循环数为2304?板固定组中的循环(范围,2020至2675),3200?螺旋固定构造的循环(范围,3101至3200)(P?= ?. 003)。关于吸收直到失败的能量,板固定组抵抗1.57?×106?106?n *循环(范围,1.21?×106到2.14?×106)和螺钉固定组到3.17?×106? n *循环(范围,2.92?×106到3.17?×106?0.1)。在这种体外生物力学研究中,仅针对标准支撑板固定的螺旋髋臼骨折的螺旋固定引起的ACPHT髋臼骨折导致良好的构建生存。两种方法都抵抗了预期在生理条件下的力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号