...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle
【24h】

Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle

机译:腰椎平原X线片不可靠,以识别Castellvi分类原则的腰骶过渡椎骨类型

获取原文
           

摘要

The anteroposterior view of the lumbar plain radiograph (AP-LPR) was chosen as the original and first radiographic tool to determine and classify lumbosacral transitional vertebra with morphological abnormality (MA-LSTV) according to the Castellvi classification. However, recent studies found that AP-LPR might not be sufficient to detect or classify MA-LSTV correctly. The present study aims to verify the reliability of AP-LPR on detecting and classifying MA-LSTV types, taking coronal reconstructed CT images (CT-CRIs) as the gold criteria. Patients with suspected MA-LSTVs determined by AP-LPR were initially enrolled. Among them, those who received CT-CRIs were formally enrolled to verify the sensitivity of AP-LPR on detecting and classifying MA-LSTV types according to the Castellvi classification principle. A total of 298 cases were initially enrolled as suspected MA-LSTV, among which 91 cases who received CT-CRIs were enrolled into the final study group. All suspected MA-LSTVs were verified to be real MA-LSTVs by CT-CRIs. However, 35.2% of the suspected MA-LSTV types judged by AP-LPR were not consistent with the final types judged by CT-CRIs. Two suspected type IIIa and 20 suspected type IIIb MA-LSTVs were verified to be true, while 9 of 39 suspected type IIa, 9 and 3 of 17 suspected type IIb, and 11 of 13 suspected type IV MA-LSTVs were verified to truly be type IIIa, IIIb, IV and IIIb MA-LSTVs by CT-CRIs, respectively. Incomplete joint-like structure (JLS) or bony union structure (BUS) and remnants of sclerotic band (RSB) between the transverse process (TP) and sacrum were considered to be the main reasons for misclassification. Although AP-LPR could correctly detect MA-LSTV, it could not give accurate type classification. CT-CRIs could provide detailed information between the TP and sacrum area and could be taken as the gold standard to detect and classify MA-LSTV.
机译:根据Castellvi分类,选择了腰椎平原X线片(AP-LPR)的前后视图作为原始和第一射线照相工具,以确定和分类腰骶过渡椎骨(MA-LSTV)。然而,最近的研究发现,AP-LPR可能不足以正确检测或分类MA-LSTV。本研究旨在验证AP-LPR对检测和分类MA-LSTV类型的可靠性,将冠状重建的CT图像(CT-CRIS)作为金标准。最初注册了AP-LPR测定的疑似MA-LSTV的患者。其中,那些接受CT-CR的人正式注册,根据Castellvi分类原则验证AP-LPR对检测和分类MA-LSTV类型的敏感性。总共298例初始注册了疑似MA-LSTV,其中91例接受CT-CRIS的案件纳入最终研究组。所有疑似的MA-LSTV都被CT-CRIS验证了真实的MA-LSTV。然而,AP-LPR判断的35.2%的疑似MA-LSTV类型与CT-CRIS判断的最终类型不一致。验证了两种疑似IIIa和20型疑似IIIB类MA-LSTV,而39型疑似IIA型IIa,9和3的疑似IIIb,9和3种,13型疑似IV型MA-LSTV的型型IIIb,9和3型型型III型型IIA型和11型型号为9型和13种疑似型IV型MA-LSTV型均核实CT-CRIN的IIIA型,IIIB,IV和IIIB MA-LSTVS分别。横向过程(TP)和骶骨之间的硬化带(RSB)之间的不完全关节结构(JLS)或骨架结构(总线)和残余物被认为是错误分类的主要原因。虽然AP-LPR可以正确检测MA-LSTV,但它无法提供准确的类型分类。 CT-Cris可以提供TP和骶骨区域之间的详细信息,可以作为探测和分类MA-LSTV的金标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号