...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr’s relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews
【24h】

The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr’s relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews

机译:标题和抽象筛查的半自动化:回顾性探索避开Abstrackr相关性预测系统和快速评论的方法

获取原文

摘要

We investigated the feasibility of using a machine learning tool’s relevance predictions to expedite title and abstract screening. We subjected 11 systematic reviews and six rapid reviews to four retrospective screening simulations (automated and semi-automated approaches to single-reviewer and dual independent screening) in Abstrackr, a freely-available machine learning software. We calculated the proportion missed, workload savings, and time savings compared to single-reviewer and dual independent screening by human reviewers. We performed cited reference searches to determine if missed studies would be identified via reference list scanning. For systematic reviews, the semi-automated, dual independent screening approach provided the best balance of time savings (median (range) 20 (3–82) hours) and reliability (median (range) proportion missed records, 1 (0–14)%). The cited references search identified 59% (n?=?10/17) of the records missed. For the rapid reviews, the fully and semi-automated approaches saved time (median (range) 9 (2–18) hours and 3 (1–10) hours, respectively), but less so than for the systematic reviews. The median (range) proportion missed records for both approaches was 6 (0–22)%. Using Abstrackr to assist one of two reviewers in systematic reviews saves time with little risk of missing relevant records. Many missed records would be identified via other means.
机译:我们调查了使用机器学习工具的相关预测来加快标题和抽象筛选的可行性。我们在AbstrackR中进行了11个系统的评论和六次快速评论,以四次回顾性筛选模拟(自动化和半自动化的方法,单位审阅者和双独立筛选)是一个可自由的机器学习软件。与单审阅者和人类审稿人的双重独立筛选相比,我们计算了错过的比例,工作量节约和时间节省。我们执行了引用的参考搜索,以确定是否通过参考列表扫描来识别错过的研究。对于系统评价,半自动,双独立筛选方法提供了节省时间最佳的余额(中位数(范围)20(3-82)小时)和可靠性(中位数(范围)比例错过记录,1(0-14) %)。所引用的引用搜索确定了错过的记录的59%(n?= 10/17)。对于快速评论,全自动和半自动化方法保存时间(中位数(范围)9(2-18)小时和3小时(1-10)小时,但少于系统评论。两种方法的中位数(范围)比例错过了记录为6(0-22)%。使用Abstrackr在系统评论中帮助两个审阅者之一,节省了缺少相关记录的风险。许多错过的记录将通过其他方式识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号