首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Homogeneity score test of AC 1 statistics and estimation of common AC 1 in multiple or stratified inter-rater agreement studies
【24h】

Homogeneity score test of AC 1 statistics and estimation of common AC 1 in multiple or stratified inter-rater agreement studies

机译:AC 1统计的同质性评分试验及普通AC 1在多种或分层间协定研究中的估算

获取原文
           

摘要

Cohen’s κ coefficient is often used as an index to measure the agreement of inter-rater determinations. However, κ varies greatly depending on the marginal distribution of the target population and overestimates the probability of agreement occurring by chance. To overcome these limitations, an alternative and more stable agreement coefficient was proposed, referred to as Gwet’s AC1. When it is desired to combine results from multiple agreement studies, such as in a meta-analysis, or to perform stratified analysis with subject covariates that affect agreement, it is of interest to compare several agreement coefficients and present a common agreement index. A homogeneity test of κ was developed; however, there are no reports on homogeneity tests for AC1 or on an estimator of common AC1. In this article, a homogeneity score test for AC1 is therefore derived, in the case of two raters with binary outcomes from K independent strata and its performance is investigated. An estimation of the common AC1 between strata and its confidence intervals is also discussed. Two homogeneity tests are provided: a score test and a goodness-of-fit test. In this study, the confidence intervals are derived by asymptotic, Fisher’s Z transformation and profile variance methods. Monte Carlo simulation studies were conducted to examine the validity of the proposed methods. An example using clinical data is also provided. Type I error rates of the proposed score test were close to the nominal level when conducting simulations with small and moderate sample sizes. The confidence intervals based on Fisher’s Z transformation and the profile variance method provided coverage levels close to nominal over a wide range of parameter combination. The method proposed in this study is considered to be useful for summarizing evaluations of consistency performed in multiple or stratified inter-rater agreement studies, for meta-analysis of reports from multiple groups and for stratified analysis.
机译:科恩的κ系数经常被用作衡量评估互动阶段的指数。然而,κ取决于目标人口的边际分布,并高估偶然发生的协议概率。为了克服这些限制,提出了一种替代和更稳定的协议系数,称为GWET的AC1。当希望将来自多项协议研究的结果组合时,例如在META分析中,或者通过影响协议的主题协变者进行分层分析,比较若干协议系数并呈现普通协议指数。开发了κ的均匀性试验;然而,AC1的同质性测试没有报告或常见AC1的估计。在本文中,因此导出了AC1的均匀性评分试验,在两种具有来自K独立地层的二元成果的评分的情况下,研究了其性能。还讨论了地层之间的公共AC1及其置信区间之间的估计。提供了两个均匀性测试:评分测试和拟合良好测试。在这项研究中,置信区间是通过渐近,Fisher的Z转换和轮廓方差方法来源的。进行蒙特卡罗模拟研究以检查所提出的方法的有效性。还提供了使用临床数据的示例。当使用小和适度的样品尺寸进行模拟时,所提出的评分测试的I型错误率接近标称级别。基于Fisher Z变换的置信区间和轮廓方差方法提供了接近标称参数组合的覆盖水平。本研究提出的方法被认为是有助于总结在多个或分层间协定研究中的一致性的评估,用于从多个群体的报告和分层分析进行荟萃分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号