首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Oral Research >Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
【24h】

Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment

机译:萃取和非驱动级别治疗后面部轮廓变化的审美感知

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract This retrospective study evaluated facial profile pleasantness determined by two protocols of Class II treatment. The sample comprised facial profile silhouettes obtained retrospectively from the pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) cephalograms of 60 patients (42 males and 18 females) divided into two groups. One group of 30 patients (mean age of 12.84 years) was treated with the extraction of maxillary first premolars (mean treatment time of 2.7 years), and the other group of 30 patients (mean age of 12.81 years) was treated with a mandibular advancement appliance (Forsus) (mean treatment time of 2.49 years). The facial profile silhouettes (T1 and T2) were randomly distributed in an album containing one patient per sheet. The examiners consisted of 60 orthodontists and 60 lay individuals, who analyzed the profiles in regard to facial pleasantness, using the Likert scale. A comparison between stages T1 and T2 of the two treatment protocols and between the examiners was performed by mixed-design analysis of variance at a significance level of 5%. The results demonstrated a significant difference between T1 and T2 (greater scores for T2 compared to T1), and between lay individuals and orthodontists (orthodontists assigned higher scores), but with no significant difference between the treatment protocols. Both protocols produced positive effects on the facial profile esthetics, from the standpoint of lay individuals and orthodontists.
机译:摘要此回顾性研究评估了由两种二级治疗协议确定的面部型材舒适性。该样品包括从预处理(T1)和60名患者(42名男性和18名女性)的预处理(T1)和后处理(T2)头骨分为两组的患者的面部轮廓轮廓。一组30名患者(平均年龄为12.84岁),用上颌第一前磨牙(平均治疗时间为2.7岁),另一组30名患者(平均年龄为12.81岁)治疗下颌前进设备(Forsus)(平均治疗时间为2.49年)。面部轮廓剪影(T1和T2)随机分布在含有每张患者的一张患者的专辑中。审查员包括60名东正教和60个人,他们使用李克特规模分析了面部愉悦程度的概况。两种治疗方案的阶段T1和T2之间的比较通过混合设计分析,其显着性水平为5%的差异。结果表明T1和T2之间的显着差异(与T2相比,T2的更大分数),并且在小位子和矫正器(矫正者分配更高分数)之间,但治疗方案之间没有显着差异。这两个方案从小个体和矫正器的角度来看,对面部剖面主义的影响产生了积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号