首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Lebanese students’ motivation in medical school: does it change throughout the years? A cross-sectional study
【24h】

Lebanese students’ motivation in medical school: does it change throughout the years? A cross-sectional study

机译:黎巴嫩学生在医学院的动机:它在整个年内发生变化吗?横断面研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Students entering medical school are driven by different types of motivation: autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, or amotivation. Motivation types can influence students’ performance, outcome and well-being. To our knowledge, this topic has never been studied in Lebanese medical students. This study aims to identify students’ motivation types in the first 5 years of medical school at two Lebanese universities (USJ and USEK). It also aims to determine the predominant motivation type of the whole sample. Results may be the first step towards raising awareness about this topic and implementing actions that enhance autonomous motivation. A cross-sectional study was performed between January and June 2017. A questionnaire was sent to medical students by e-mail. The students’ academic motivation was assessed using the Academic Motivation Scale. A higher mean autonomous motivation score was found in each academic year, as compared to the mean controlled motivation and amotivation scores. The highest mean autonomous motivation score was seen among second year students, whereas the lowest score was noted in fifth year students. The highest scores for controlled motivation and amotivation belonged to the fourth-year students, and the lowest to the first-year students. Students who were still satisfied with medical studies had a higher autonomous motivation score. Finally, USJ students who were satisfied with their second year training had a higher mean autonomous motivation score than those who were not. This study showed high levels of autonomous motivation in the first five years of medical school. Autonomous motivation was the predominant type in the whole sample. The highest scores of controlled motivation and amotivation were noted in the fourth year. Moreover, high levels of self-determination were seen in students who enjoyed their early contacts with patients through trainings. Actions should be implemented in medical schools to enhance and maintain autonomous motivation, and consequently students’ outcome and health-care quality.
机译:进入医学院的学生是由不同类型的动机驱动:自治动机,受控动机或神经活动。动机类型可以影响学生的表现,结果和福祉。据我们所知,这一主题从未在黎巴嫩医学生。本研究旨在在黎巴嫩大学(USJ和USEK)的医学院的前5年中识别学生的激励类型。它还旨在确定整个样本的主要动机类型。结果可能是提高对这一主题的认识的第一步,并实施提升自治动机的行动。 2017年1月至6月在2017年6月之间进行了横断面研究。通过电子邮件向医疗学生发送问卷。学生的学术动机是使用学术动机规模评估的。与均值控制的动机和春季分数相比,每个学年都发现了更高的平均自主动力。在二年级学生中看到了最高的自主动机得分,而第五年学生指出的最低分数。受控动机和春季的最高评分属于第四年的学生,最低为一年的学生。仍然满足医学研究的学生具有更高的自主动机得分。最后,对第二年培训感到满意的USJ学生具有比那些不是那些人的自主动机得分更高。这项研究表明,医学院的前五年中表现出高度的自主动机。自主动机是整个样本中的主要类型。在第四年度指出了受控动机和春季的最高评分。此外,在通过培训中享受与患者的早期接触的学生中看到了高水平的自决。应在医学院实施行动,以加强和维持自主动机,从而提高学生的结果和保健品质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号