首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Risk of death after first-time blood stream infection in incident dialysis patients with specific consideration on vascular access and comorbidity
【24h】

Risk of death after first-time blood stream infection in incident dialysis patients with specific consideration on vascular access and comorbidity

机译:入射透析患者首次血流血流感染患者死亡风险,具有关于血管进入和合并症的具体考虑

获取原文
           

摘要

The mortality following blood stream infection (BSI) and risk of subsequent BSI in relation to dialysis modality, vascular access, and other potential risk factors has received relatively little attention. Consequently, we assessed these matters in a retrospective cohort study, by use of the Danish nation-wide registries. Patients more than 17?years of age, who initiated dialysis between 1.1.2010 and 1.1.2014, were grouped according to their dialysis modality and vascular access. Survival was modeled in time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analyses. Potential risk factors confined by a modified Charlson comorbidity index (MCCI), were subsequently assessed in stepwise selection models. At baseline, 764 patients received peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 434, 479, and 782 hemodialysis (HD) patients were dialyzed by use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), tunneled catheters (TCs), and non-tunneled catheters (NTCs), respectively. We identified 1069 BSIs with an overall incidence rate of 17.7 episodes per 100 person years, and 216 BSIs occurred more than one time in the same patient. HRs of post BSI mortality relative to PD were 3.20 (95% CI 1.86-5.50; p??0.001) with NTCs; whereas no associations were found for AVF and TC. The risk of subsequent BSIs was higher with NTCs [HR 2.29 (95% CI 1.09-4.82), p?=?0.030], and no significant difference was found for AVF and TC, in relation to PD. There was an increased risk of both outcomes with TC relative to AVF [death: 1.57 (95% CI 1.07-2.29, P??0.021); BSI: 1.78 (95% CI 1.13-2.83, P??0.014], and risk of death was reduced in patients who changed to AVF after first-time BSI. The MCCI was significantly associated with the risk of subsequent BSI and post BSI death; however, only some of the variables contained in the index were found to be significant risk predictors when analyzed in the fitted model. While NTC was the most predominant risk factor for subsequent BSI and post BSI mortality, AVF appeared protective.
机译:血流感染后的死亡率(BSI)以及随后与透析模态,血管进入和其他潜在风险因素相关的后续BSI的风险已经受到相对较少的关注。因此,我们通过使用丹麦国家范围的注册管理机构在回顾性队列研究中评估了这些问题。患者超过17岁,在1.1.2010和1.1.2014之间启动透析的透析,根据其透析形式和血管进入进行分组。存活率在时间依赖于时间的Cox比例危险分析中进行了建模。随后在逐步选择模型中评估了改进的Charlson合并症指数(MCCI)限制的潜在风险因素。在基线,通过使用动静脉瘘(AVF),隧道导管(TCS)和非隧道导管(NTCS),764名患者接受腹膜透析(PD)和434,479和782名血液透析(HD)血液透析(HD)患者,分别。我们确定了1069个BSI,总发生率为17.7个百年的发作,216个BSI在同一患者中发生了多次。 BSI后死亡率相对于PD的HRS为3.20(95%CI 1.86-5.50; p?<0.001),NTCS;而没有针对AVF和TC找到任何关联。随后的BSI的风险较高,NTCS [HR 2.29(95%CI 1.09-4.82),P?= 0.030],并且对于PD而言,AVF和TC没有发现显着差异。与AVF相对于AVF两种结果的风险增加[死亡:1.57(95%CI 1.07-2.29,P?<0.021); BSI:1.78(95%CI 1.13-2.83,P?<?0.014],在首次BSI后改为AVF的患者中,死亡风险降低。MCCI与后续BSI和BSI的风险显着相关死亡;然而,在拟合模型中分析时,只发现指数中包含的一些变量是重大的风险预测因子。虽然NTC是随后的BSI和BSI死亡率的最主要危险因素,但AVF出现了保护性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号