...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study
【24h】

Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study

机译:实施幸福集团干预自我管理的步伐和决定因素:多级观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

When implementing an empirically supported intervention (ESI) arrays of influencing factors operate on the professional and organizational level, but so far dependency between these levels has often been ignored. The aim of this study is to describe the pace and identify determinants of implementation of the Self-Management of Well-being (SMW) group intervention while taking the dependency between professionals and organizations into account. Pace of implementation was measured as the time between training of professionals and first use of the SMW intervention in months. Determinants of first use were derived from the Fleuren framework and assessed using web-based questionnaires and telephone interviews. First, univariate analyses, Fisher's exact tests and t-tests, were performed to identify determinants of first use of the SMW intervention on the individual professional and the organizational level independently. Second, multilevel analyses were performed to correct for the dependency between professionals and organizations. Simple multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed with determinants found significant in the univariate analyses as independent variables, first use as dependent variable, professionals entered in the first level, and organizations in the second level. Forty-eight professionals from 18 organizations were trained to execute the SMW intervention. Thirty-two professionals achieved first use, at a mean pace of 7.5?months ±?4.2. Determinants on the professional level were 'ownership', 'relative advantage', 'support from colleagues' and 'compatibility'. Determinants on the organizational level were 'organizational size' and 'innovation-task orientation fit'. Multilevel analysis showed that 'compatibility', a factor on the professional level, was the only significant determinant contributing to first use in the multilevel model. This implementation study revealed a strong dependency between professionals and organizations. Results showed that a majority of professionals used the SMW intervention in about 8?months. When the dependency between professionals and organization was taken into account, the professionals' perception of compatibility was the only remaining determinant of implementation on the professional level. Organizational size and managers' perception of 'innovation-task orientation fit' were determinants of implementation on the organizational level. It is advisable to discuss the compatibility between new and current tasks among managers and professionals before adopting a new intervention.
机译:在实施经验支持的干预(ESI)的影响因素阵列时,在专业和组织层面运行,但到目前为止,这些层面之间的依赖往往忽略了。本研究的目的是描述步伐和确定实施福祉(SMW)组干预的自我管理的决定因素,同时考虑到专业人士和组织之间的依赖。作为专业人员培训与第一次使用数月的SMW干预之间的时间测量了速度。首次使用的决定因素来自Fleuren框架,并使用基于网络的问卷和电话访谈评估。首先,进行单变量分析,Fisher的确切测试和T检验,旨在识别第一次使用SMW干预对个人专业人员和组织层面的决定因素。其次,对多级分析进行了纠正专业人员和组织之间的依赖。简单的多级逻辑回归分析进行了在单变量分析中发现的决定因素作为独立变量,首先用作依赖变量,在第一级输入的专业人士以及第二级的组织。来自18个组织的四十八个专业人员培训执行SMW干预。三十二名专业人士首次使用,平均速度为7.5?月±4.2。专业水平的决定因素是“所有权”,“相对优势”,“同事的支持”和“兼容性”。组织层面的决定因素是“组织规模”和“创新任务方向合适”。多级分析表明,“兼容性”,专业水平的一个因素,是唯一重要的决定因素,促使在多级模型中首次使用。这项实施研究揭示了专业人士和组织之间的强大依赖。结果表明,大多数专业人员在大约8个月内使用了SMW干预。当考虑专业人士和组织之间的依赖时,专业人员的兼容性感知是唯一剩下的专业水平实施决定因素。组织规模和管理人员对“创新任务导向合适”的看法是组织层面实施的决定因素。建议在采用新干预之前讨论经理和专业人士之间的新和当前任务之间的兼容性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号