...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >What systemic factors contribute to collaboration between primary care and public health sectors? An interpretive descriptive study
【24h】

What systemic factors contribute to collaboration between primary care and public health sectors? An interpretive descriptive study

机译:哪些系统因素有助于初级保健和公共卫生部门之间的合作?一种解释性描述性研究

获取原文

摘要

Purposefully building stronger collaborations between primary care (PC) and public health (PH) is one approach to strengthening primary health care. The purpose of this paper is to report: 1) what systemic factors influence collaborations between PC and PH; and 2) how systemic factors interact and could influence collaboration. This interpretive descriptive study used purposive and snowball sampling to recruit and conduct interviews with PC and PH key informants in British Columbia (n?=?20), Ontario (n?=?19), and Nova Scotia (n?=?21), Canada. Other participants (n?=?14) were knowledgeable about collaborations and were located in various Canadian provinces or working at a national level. Data were organized into codes and thematic analysis was completed using NVivo. The frequency of “sources” (individual transcripts), “references” (quotes), and matrix queries were used to identify potential relationships between factors. We conducted a total of 70 in-depth interviews with 74 participants working in either PC (n?=?33) or PH (n?=?32), both PC and PH (n?=?7), or neither sector (n?=?2). Participant roles included direct service providers (n?=?17), senior program managers (n?=?14), executive officers (n?=?11), and middle managers (n?=?10). Seven systemic factors for collaboration were identified: 1) health service structures that promote collaboration; 2) funding models and financial incentives supporting collaboration; 3) governmental and regulatory policies and mandates for collaboration; 4) power relations; 5) harmonized information and communication infrastructure; 6) targeted professional education; and 7) formal systems leaders as collaborative champions. Most themes were discussed with equal frequency between PC and PH. An assessment of the system level context (i.e., provincial and regional organization and funding of PC and PH, history of government in successful implementation of health care reform, etc) along with these seven system level factors could assist other jurisdictions in moving towards increased PC and PH collaboration. There was some variation in the importance of the themes across provinces. British Columbia participants more frequently discussed system structures that could promote collaboration, power relations, harmonized information and communication structures, formal systems leaders as collaboration champions and targeted professional education. Ontario participants most frequently discussed governmental and regulatory policies and mandates for collaboration.
机译:目的地建立更强的初级保健(PC)和公共卫生(pH)之间的合作是加强初级保健的一种方法。本文的目的是报告:1)哪些系统因素在PC和PH之间的合作; 2)系统因素如何互动,可以影响合作。这种解释性描述性研究使用了有目的地和雪球抽样来招募并进行不列颠哥伦比亚省(N?=?20),安大略省(N?=?19)和Nova Scotia(n?=?21)的PC和PH重点线人访谈, 加拿大。其他参与者(N?=?14)是关于合作的知识,并位于各种加拿大各省或在国家一级工作。数据被组织成代码,并使用NVIVO完成主题分析。 “源”(单个成绩单),“引用”(引用)和矩阵查询的频率用于识别因子之间的潜在关系。我们共进行了70个深入的访谈,其中74名参与者在PC(N?= 33)或pC(n?= 32),既不(n?=?7),或既不是扇区( n?=?2)。参与者角色包括直接服务提供商(n?=?17),高级计划经理(n?=?14),执行官(n?=?11)和中间管理器(n?=?10)。确定合奏的七个系统因素:1)促进合作的卫生服务结构; 2)资助模式和金融激励支持合作; 3)政府和监管政策和合作任务; 4)电力关系; 5)统一信息和通信基础设施; 6)有针对性的专业教育; 7)正式的系统领导人作为合作冠军。大多数主题在PC和pH之间以相同的频率讨论。对系统级背景(即,PC和PC和PC的资助,政府历史,在成功实施医疗保健改革)以及这七个系统级别因素可以协助其他司法管辖区迁移到增加的PC和pH合作。各省主题的重要性有一些变化。不列颠哥伦比亚省参与者更常常讨论系统结构,可以促进协作,权力关系,统一信息和通信结构,正式的系统领导人作为合作冠军和有针对性的专业教育。安大略省参与者最常讨论政府和监管政策和合作任务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号