...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Oncology nurses‘ beliefs and attitudes towards the double-check of chemotherapy medications: a cross-sectional survey study
【24h】

Oncology nurses‘ beliefs and attitudes towards the double-check of chemotherapy medications: a cross-sectional survey study

机译:肿瘤医院的信仰和态度对化疗药物的双重检查:横断面调查研究

获取原文

摘要

Double-checking medications is a widely used strategy to enhance safe medication administration in oncology, but there is little evidence to support its effectiveness. The proliferated use of double-checking may be explained by positive attitudes towards checking among nurses. This study investigated oncology nurses’ beliefs towards double-checking medication, its relation to beliefs about safety and the influence of nurses’ level of experience and proximity to clinical care. This was a survey of all oncology nurses in three Swiss hospitals. The questionnaire contained 41 items on 6 domains. Responses were recorded using a 7-point Likert scale. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors linked to strong beliefs in the effectiveness of double-checking. Overall, 274 (70%) out of 389 nurses responded (91% female, mean age 37 (standard deviation?=?10)). Nurses reported very strong beliefs in the effectiveness and utility of double-checking. They were also confident about their own performance in double-checking. Nurses widely believed that double checking produced safety (e.g., 86% believed errors of individuals could be intercepted with double-checks). In contrast, some limitations of double-checking were also recognized, e.g., 33% of nurses reported that double checking caused frequent interruptions and 28% reported that double-checking was done superficially in their unit. Regression analysis revealed that beliefs in effectiveness of double-checking were mainly associated with beliefs in safety production (p?
机译:双重检查药物是一种广泛使用的策略,可以增强肿瘤的安全药物管理,但几乎没有证据支持其有效性。可以通过对护士进行检查的积极态度来解释双重检查的增殖使用。本研究调查了肿瘤学护士对双重检查药物的信念,其与护士的信仰的关系以及护士的经验水平和临床护理的影响。这是对三家瑞士医院的所有肿瘤护士进行调查。调查问卷在6个域名包含41项。使用7点李克特量表记录响应。多元回归分析用于识别与双重检查有效性相关的强烈信仰的因素。总体而言,389名护士中的274名(70%)作出反应(女性91%,平均年龄37(标准差?=?10))。护士报告了双重检查的有效性和效用的信仰非常强烈。他们对双重检查的表现也很自信。护士普遍认为,双重检查产生的安全性(例如,86%的人认为个体错误可以用双重检查拦截)。相比之下,两次检查的一些局限性也得到了认可,例如,33%的护士报告称,双重检查频繁的中断,28%报告称,双重检查在其单位上面完成了双重检查。回归分析显示,双重检查有效性的信念主要与安全生产的信仰有关(p?<〜0.001)。具有条形码扫描经验的护士在双重检查的有效性中保持了不太强烈的信念(p?= 0.006)。与我们的期望相比,任何专业小组之间的信念都没有差异。普遍宽敞的信任双重检查的有效性与安全生产的信念相关联,并共存了对人类双重检查的主要缺点的承认。这些结果是考虑适应任何现有程序或实施新的检查程序时的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号