首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of suction and inner-stylet of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy
【24h】

Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of suction and inner-stylet of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy

机译:随机对照试验,评价吸入和内风特性eBus-tbna对纵隔和肝单独的淋巴结病的效用

获取原文
           

摘要

The optimal procedure for maximizing the diagnostic yield and minimizing the procedural complexity of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is controversial. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to determine the optimal procedure of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, with a particular focus on the roles of the inner-stylet and suction. Consecutive patients with enlarged mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes (LNs), detected by computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), who underwent EBUS-TBNA were included. Each LN was sampled with three needle passes using suction-stylet, suction-no stylet, and stylet-no suction procedures. The samples were smeared onto glass slides for cytological evaluation. A single, blinded cytopathologist evaluated each set of slides. The primary outcomes were cytological specimen adequacy rate and diagnostic yield of malignant LNs. The secondary outcomes were tissue-core acquisition rate, procedural time, and the amount of bleeding. This study evaluated 97 patients with a total of 255 LNs. The final LN diagnosis was benign in 144, malignant in 104, and inadequate in 7 cases. There were no significant differences among the suction-stylet, suction-no stylet, and stylet-no suction groups in specimen adequacy rate (87.1, 88.2, 85.9%, respectively) or diagnostic yield of malignancy (32.2, 31.8, 31.0%, respectively). However, the use of suction was associated with an increase in tissue-core acquisition rate (P???0.001). The no-stylet procedure decreased the average procedural time by 14?s (P???0.001). There was no significant difference in the amount of bleeding among the procedures. The use of suction or non-use of an inner-stylet does not make a significant difference in cytological specimen adequacy or diagnostic yield when performing EBUS-TBNA. While omitting the stylet can simplify the procedure, applying suction can increase the tissue-core acquisition rate. These findings may assist endoscopic physicians in determining the optimal EBUS-TBNA procedure and warrant clinical verification in a future multicentre study. Trial registration: ( ChiCTR-IOR-17010616 ). Retrospective registered date: 12th February, 2017.
机译:用于最大化诊断率和减少支气管内超声引导经支气管针抽吸(EBUS-TBNA)的程序复杂性的最佳过程是有争议的。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,以确定纵隔和肺门淋巴结肿大EBUS-TBNA的最佳过程,特别着眼于内管心针和抽吸的作用。连续患者肿大的纵隔和肺门淋巴结(LNS),由计算机断层摄影(CT)或正电子发射断层扫描-CT(PET-CT),谁接受EBUS-TBNA被列入检测。与三针每次的LN取样用吸口针,吸无钢丝,和探针,无吸程程序通过。将样品涂到载玻片上进行细胞学评估。一个单一的,盲细胞病理学家评估的每个组幻灯片。主要结果是细胞学样本充足率和恶性LNS的诊断产量。次级终点是组织芯采集速率,程序时间和出血量。本研究评估了97例共255升的患者。最终的诊断LN在144良性的,在104恶性的,7例不足。吸风机的吸入式,抽吸 - 没有探测器和探针 - 没有显着的差异,在标本充分率(87.1,88.2,85.9%)或恶性肿瘤的诊断产量(32.2,31.8,31.0%) )。然而,使用抽吸的使用与组织核心采集率的增加有关(p?<ΔOwy)。无管心针通过过程14降低平均程序时间?的(P <???0.001)。有没有在过程中的出血量无差异显著。使用抽吸或不使用一内管心针的执行EBUS-TBNA时不会使在细胞样本充足一个显著差或诊断率。而省略探针可以简化过程,施加抽吸可以增加组织芯采集速率。这些发现可能有助于医生内镜在确定最佳EBUS-TBNA过程,并在未来的多中心研究保证临床验证。试验注册:(ChiCTR简介-10R-17010616)。回顾注册日期:2017年2月12日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号