首页> 外文期刊>BMC Veterinary Research >Comparison of different NAT assays for the detection of microorganisms belonging to the class Mollicutes
【24h】

Comparison of different NAT assays for the detection of microorganisms belonging to the class Mollicutes

机译:不同NAT测定对属于舱室棺材的微生物检测的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Mollicutes detection can be cumbersome due to their slow growth in vitro. For this reason, the use of DNA based on generic molecular tests represents an alternative for rapid, sensitive and specific detection of these microorganism. For this reason, six previously described nucleic acid testing assays were compared to evaluate their ability to detect microorganisms belonging to the class Mollicutes . Methods A panel of 61 mollicutes, including representatives from the Mycoplasma , Acholeplasma , Mesoplasma , Spiroplasma and Ureaplasma genus, were selected to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of these assays. A total of 21 non-mollicutes, including closely related non-mollicutes species, were used to evaluate specificity. Limits of detection were calculated to determine the analytical sensitivity of the assays. The two best performing assays were subsequently adapted into real-time PCR format, followed by melting curve analysis. Results Both assays performed satisfactorily, with a 100% specificity described for both assays. The detection limits were found to be between 10?4 and 10?5 dilutions, equivalent to 15 to 150 genome copies approximately. Based on our work, both van Kuppeveld and Botes real-time PCR assays were found to be the best performing tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, Botes real-time PCR assay could detect phytoplasmas as well. Conclusions These assays can be very useful for the rapid, specific and sensitive screening cell line contaminants, clinical samples as well as detecting non-culturable, unknown species of mollicutes or mollicutes whose growth is slow or difficult.
机译:由于它们在体外缓慢的增长,背景卵氏菌体检测可能是麻烦的。因此,基于通用分子试验的DNA的使用代表了这些微生物的快速,灵敏和特异性检测的替代方案。因此,将六种先前描述的核酸测试测定进行了评估,以评估它们检测属于群体的微生物的能力。方法选择61块蜂房的面板,包括支原体,脑卒中,脱蛋白,螺旋状物和脲脲基属的代表,评价这些测定的敏感性和特异性。共21种非蜂房,包括密切相关的非莫氏物种,用于评估特异性。计算检测限制以确定测定的分析敏感性。随后将两种最佳性能的测定转化为实时PCR格式,然后熔化曲线分析。结果两种测定令人满意地进行,两种测定有100%的特异性。发现检测限为10 4 / sop>和10 Δ5℃,相当于约15至150个基因组拷贝。根据我们的作品,van Kuppeveld和Botes实时PCR测定被认为是在敏感性和特异性方面表现最佳的测试。此外,Botes实时PCR测定也可以检测植物植物。结论这些测定对于快速,特异性和敏感的筛选细胞系污染物,临床样本以及检测非培养,未知的卵泡或骨髓或莫尔基因的疾病非常有用,其生长缓慢或困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号