...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Nasogastric tube feeding versus assisted hand feeding in-home healthcare older adults with severe dementia in Taiwan: a prognosis comparison
【24h】

Nasogastric tube feeding versus assisted hand feeding in-home healthcare older adults with severe dementia in Taiwan: a prognosis comparison

机译:鼻胃管喂养与辅助手喂养家庭医疗老年人,台湾严重痴呆症:预后比较

获取原文
           

摘要

All individuals with severe dementia should be offered careful hand feeding. However, under certain circumstances, people with severe dementia have a feeding tube placed. In Taiwan, tube feeding rate in demented older home care residents is increasing; however, the benefits of tube feeding in this population remain unknown. We compared the clinical prognosis and mortality of older patients with severe dementia receiving nasogastric tube feeding (NGF) or assisted hand feeding (AHF). Data from the in-home healthcare system between January 1 and December 31, 2017 were analyzed to identify 169 participants over 60?years of age in this retrospective longitudinal study. All subjects with severe dementia and complete functional dependence suffered from difficulty in oral intake and required either AHF or NGF. Data were collected from both groups to analyze pneumonia, hospitalization, and mortality rates. A total of 169 subjects (56 males and 113 females, aged 85.9?±?7.5?years) were analyzed. 39 required AHF and 130 NGF. All subjects were bedridden; 129 (76%) showed Barthel index ?10. Pneumonia risk was higher in the NGF group (48%) than in the AHF group (26%, p?=?0.015). After adjusting for multiple factors in the regression model, the risk of pneumonia was not significantly higher in the NGF group compared with the AHF group. One-year mortality rates in the AHF and NGF groups were 8 and 15%, respectively, and no significant difference was observed after adjustment with logistic regression (aOR?=?2.38; 95% CI, 0.58–9.70). There were no significant differences in hospitalization rate and duration. For older patients with dementia requiring in-home healthcare, NGF is not associated with a significantly lower risk of pneumonia than AHF. Additionally, neither mortality nor hospitalization rates decreased with NGF. On the contrary, a nonsignificant trend of increased risk of pneumonia was observed in NGF group. Therefore, the benefits of NGF are debatable in older patients with severe dementia requiring in-home healthcare. Continued careful hand feeding could be an alternative to NG feeding in patients with severe dementia. Furthermore, large-scale studies on in-home healthcare would be required to support these results.
机译:严重痴呆所有个人应给予谨慎手喂养。然而,在某些情况下,患有严重痴呆有饲管放置。在台湾,疯狂的旧的家庭护理的居民管饲的速度增长;然而,管饲在这一人群的利益仍然是未知的。我们比较了临床预后和老年患者,严重痴呆接收鼻饲管饲(NGF)或辅助的手馈送(AHF)的死亡率。从1月1日和12月31日之间的家用医疗保健系统中的数据,2017年进行了分析60,以确定169名参与者?岁在这项回顾性纵向研究。严重痴呆和完整的功能依赖所有受试者从困难中误服遭遇和要求要么AHF或NGF。数据来自两个组收集,分析肺炎,住院率和死亡率。总共169名受试者(56名男性和女性113,年龄85.9?±?7.5〜岁)进行了分析。 39需要AHF和130 NGF。所有受试者都卧床不起; 129(76%)显示出Barthel指数<?10。肺炎风险是NGF组(48%)中比AHF组(26%,p值= 0.015)较高。调整回归模型多因素后,肺炎的风险是不显著高于NGF组与AHF组相比。一年死亡率在AHF和NGF组分别为8和15%,分别与逻辑回归调整后没有观察到差异显著(AOR = 2.38;?95%CI,0.58-9.70)。有住院率和持续时间没有显著差异。对于年龄较大的老年痴呆症患者,需要在家庭医疗保健,NGF不与肺炎比AHF的显著风险较低。此外,无论是死亡还是住院率与NGF下降。相反,NGF组观察到肺炎的风险增加一个显着的趋势。因此,NGF的好处是在老年患者,严重痴呆,需要在家庭医疗保健值得商榷。继续精心喂养的手可能是患有严重痴呆NG喂养的替代品。此外,在家庭医疗保健的大型研究将需要支持这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号