首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal
【24h】

Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal

机译:胰管导管导管胆汁插管的放置作为内窥镜翻透石渣后石渣的危险因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Recent improvements in stone extraction implements and apparatus have lessened the complexity of the endoscopic bile duct stone treatment. However, despite confirmation of complete removal, cases of residual stones have been reported, which can result in recurrent biliary symptoms, cholangitis, and pancreatitis and considerably increase cost given the need for repeat imaging and/or procedures. To date, risk factors for residual bile duct stones following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) extraction have not been thoroughly evaluated. This study retrospectively investigated the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones following extraction via ERCP. We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP cases that underwent endoscopic bile duct stone extraction between April 2014 and March 2019. A total of 505 patients were enrolled and evaluated for the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones after ERCP. The rate of residual stones was 4.8% (24/505). Residual stones were detected by computed tomography (12/24) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (12/24). In univariate analyses, a large number of stones (P?=?0.01), long procedure time (P?=?0.005), and performance of the pancreatic duct guidewire placement method (P-GW) for selective bile duct cannulation (P?=?0.01) were the factors involved in residual stones. In multiple logistic regression analysis, performing P-GW was retained as the only independent factor of residual stones (adjusted odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.19–9.88; P?=?0.02). When removing bile duct stones with a pancreatic guidewire in place, paying attention to residual stones is necessary.
机译:最近的石油提取工具和设备的改进减少了内窥镜胆管石材处理的复杂性。然而,尽管确认完全去除,但据报道了残留石的病例,这可能导致经常性胆道症状,胆管炎和胰腺炎,并且鉴于需要重复成像和/或程序的需要大大增加成本。迄今为止,尚未彻底评估内镜逆行后胆管胆管术(ERCP)提取后残留胆管石的危险因素。本研究回顾性地研究了通过ERCP提取后剩余胆管结石的发病率和危险因素。我们回顾性地审查了2014年4月至2019年4月期间接受内窥镜胆管石头提取的所有ERCP病例。在ERCP后,共征收了505名患者,并评估了残留胆管石的发生率和危险因素。残留石块的速率为4.8%(24/505)。通过计算断层扫描(12/24)或磁共振胆管胆癌(12/24)检测残留石。在单变量分析中,大量的石头(p?= 0.01),长程序时间(p?= 0.005),以及用于选择性胆管插管的胰管导管放置方法(P-GW)的性能(P? = 0.01)是残留石头的因素。在多元逻辑回归分析中,进行P-GW被保留为残留石块的唯一独立因子(调整的差距,3.44; 95%CI,1.19-9.88; P?= 0.02)。当用胰腺导丝去除胆管石时,需要注意残留的石头。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号