...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Primary care service use by end-of-life cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom
【24h】

Primary care service use by end-of-life cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom

机译:终生癌症患者的初级保健服务:全国范围的人口群体在英国研究

获取原文

摘要

End of life (EoL) care becomes more complex and increasingly takes place in the community, but there is little data on the use of general practice (GP) services to guide care improvement. This study aims to determine the trends and factors associated with GP consultation, prescribing and referral to other care services amongst cancer patients in the last year of life. A retrospective cohort study of cancer patients who died in 2000–2014, based on routinely collected primary care data (the Clinical Practice Research DataLink, CPRD) covering a representative sample of the population in the United Kingdom. Outcome variables were number of GP consultations (primary), number of prescriptions and referral to other care services (yes vs no) in the last year of life. Explanatory variables included socio-demographics, clinical characteristics and the status of palliative care needs recognised or not. The association between outcome and explanatory variables were evaluated using multiple-adjusted risk ratio (aRR). Of 68,523 terminal cancer patients, 70% were aged 70+, 75% had comorbidities and 45.5% had palliative care needs recognised. In the last year of life, a typical cancer patient had 43 GP consultations (Standard deviation (SD): 31.7; total?=?3,031,734), 71.5 prescriptions (SD: 68.0; total?=?5,074,178), and 21(SD: 13.0) different drugs; 58.0% of patients had at least one referral covering all main clinical specialities. More comorbid conditions, prostate cancer and having palliative care needs recognised were associated with more primary care consultations, more prescriptions and a higher chance of referral (aRRs 1.07–2.03). Increasing age was related to fewer consultations (aRRs 0.77–0.96), less prescriptions (aRR 1.09–1.44), and a higher chance of referral (aRRs 1.08–1.16) but less likely to have palliative care needs recognised (aRRs 0.53–0.89). GPs are very involved in end of life care of cancer patients, most of whom having complex care needs, i.e. older age, comorbidity and polypharmacy. This highlights the importance of enhancing primary palliative care skills among GPs and the imperative of greater integration of primary care with other healthcare professionals including oncologists, palliative care specialists, geriatricians and pharmacists. Research into the potential of deprescribing is warranted. Older patients have poorer access to both primary care and palliative care need to be addressed in future practices.
机译:生命结束(EOL)护理变得更加复杂,越来越多地发生在社区中,但是有关使用一般练习(GP)服务的数据很少有关引导护理改进。本研究旨在确定与癌症患者在过去一年的癌症患者中与其他护理服务相关联的趋势和因素。基于常规收集的初级保健数据(临床实践研究Datalink,CPRD),涉及英国人口代表性样本的癌症患者癌症患者的回顾性队列研究。结果变量是GP咨询的数量(初级),处方数量和其他护理服务的转介(是VS NO)的次数。解释性变量包括社会人口统计数据,临床特征和姑息治疗的状态确认或不承认。使用多调整的风险比(ARR)评估结果与解释变量之间的关联。在68,523例末端癌症患者中,70%的70%左右,75%的合并症,45.5%的姑息治查需要得到认可。在过去的一年中,典型的癌症患者有43个GP咨询(标准差(SD):31.7;总数?=?3,031,734),71.5个处方(SD:68.0;总数?=?5,074,178)和21(SD: 13.0)不同的药物; 58.0%的患者至少有一个涵盖所有主要临床专业的转诊。更多的合并条件,前列腺癌和姑息治疗需要认可,与更多的初级保健咨询,更多的处方和推荐机会更高有关(ARR 1.07-2.03)。随着年龄的增加与较少的磋商有关(ARR 0.77-0.96),处方较少(ARR 1.09-1.44),以及推荐的机会更高,但不太可能获得姑息保健的可能性(ARRS 0.53-0.89) 。 GPS在癌症患者的生命护理结束时非常涉及,其中大部分是复杂的护理需求,即老年人,合并症和多酚省期。这突显了加强GPS中的主要姑息治疗技能的重要性以及与其他医疗保健专业人员在内的其他医疗专家,姑息治疗专家,老年人和药剂师在内的其他医疗保健专业人士更加集成的必要性。有必要研究贬低贬低。年龄较大的患者对初级保健和姑息治疗较差,需要在未来的实践中得到解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号