首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Recruitment and reach in a pragmatic behavioral weight loss randomized controlled trial: implications for real-world primary care practice
【24h】

Recruitment and reach in a pragmatic behavioral weight loss randomized controlled trial: implications for real-world primary care practice

机译:在务实的行为减肥随机控制试验中招聘和覆盖:对现实世界初级保健实践的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Obesity is a major risk factor behind some of the most common problems encountered in primary care. Although effective models for obesity treatment have been developed, the ‘reach’ of these interventions is poor and only a small fraction of primary care patients receive evidence-based treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that impact the uptake (reach) of an evidence-based obesity treatment program within the context of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial comparing three models of care delivery. Recruitment and reach were evaluated by the following measures: 1) mailing response rates, 2) referral sources among participants contacting the study?team, 3) eligibility rates, 4) participation rates, and 5) representativeness based on demographics, co-morbid conditions, and healthcare utilization of 1432 enrolled participants compared to ?17,000 non-participants from the clinic-based patient populations. Referral sources and participation rates were compared across study arms and level of clinic engagement. The response rate to clinic-based mailings was 13.2% and accounted for 66% of overall program recruitment. An additional 22% of recruitment came from direct clinic referrals and 11% from media, family, or friends. Of those screened, 87% were eligible; among those eligible, 86% enrolled in the trial. Participation rates did not vary across the three care delivery arms, but were higher at clinics with high compared to low provider involvement. In addition, clinics with high provider involvement had a higher rate of in clinic referrals (33% versus 16%) and a more representative sample with regards to BMI, rurality, and months since last clinic visit. However, across clinics, enrolled participants compared to non-participants were older, more likely to be female, more likely to have had a joint replacement but less likely to have CVD or smoke, and had fewer hospitalizations. A combination of direct patient mailings and in-clinic referrals may enhance the reach of primary care behavioral weight loss interventions, although more proactive outreach is likely necessary for men, younger patients, and those at greater medial risk. Strategies are needed to enhance provider engagement in referring patients to behavioral weight loss programs. clnicialtrials.gov NCT02456636. Registered May 28, 2015, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=RE-POWER&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=.
机译:肥胖是初级保健中遇到的一些最常见问题的主要危险因素。虽然已经开发出有效的肥胖疗法模型,但这些干预措施的“达到”差,只有一小部分初级护理患者接受基于证据的治疗。本研究的目的是识别影响基于证据的肥胖治疗计划的摄取(覆盖)在务实的集群随机对照试验中影响了基于誓言的肥胖治疗计划的因素,比较了三种护理递送。通过以下措施评估:1)邮寄响应率,2)参与者联系研究的邮寄来源?团队,3)资格率,4)参与率和5)基于人口统计学,共同病态的参与率和5)代表性而且,医疗保健利用1432名招募参与者的读取参与者与临床诊所的患者群体的17,000名非参与者相比。在研究武器和临床参与水平上比较了推荐来源和参与率。临床邮件的响应率为13.2%,占整体计划招聘的66%。另外22%的招聘来自直接诊所推荐,距媒体,家庭或朋友11%。其中筛选的人,87%符合条件;在符合条件的人中,86%注册审判。参与率在三个护理递送武器中没有各种各样,但与低提供者参与相比,诊所的诊所高。此外,具有高提供者参与的诊所在诊所推荐中具有更高的临床推荐率(33%与16%),并在上次诊所访问以来的BMI,风格和数月方面具有更具代表性的样本。然而,与非参与者相比,参加诊所的诊所,更容易成为女性,更有可能具有联合替代,但不太可能有CVD或烟雾,并且住院时间较少。直接患者邮件和临床推荐的组合可以增强初级保健行为减肥干预措施的覆盖力,尽管男性,年轻患者可能需要更高的患者和更大内侧风险的患者所必需的。需要策略来提高提供者参与患者对行为减肥计划的参与。 ClniaralTrials.gov NCT02456636。注册2015年5月28日,https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond =&term=re-power&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号