首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Perspectives of general practitioners and nursing staff on acute hospital transfers of nursing home residents in Germany: results of two cross-sectional studies
【24h】

Perspectives of general practitioners and nursing staff on acute hospital transfers of nursing home residents in Germany: results of two cross-sectional studies

机译:德国哺乳期院长急性医院转移的全科医生和护理人员的观点:两个横截面研究的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Visits in emergency departments and hospital admissions are common among nursing home (NH) residents and they are associated with significant complications. Many of these transfers are considered inappropriate. This study aimed to compare the perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) and NH staff on hospital transfers among residents and to illustrate measures for improvement. Two cross-sectional studies were conducted as surveys among 1121 GPs in the German federal states Bremen and Lower Saxony and staff from 1069 NHs (preferably nursing staff managers) from all over Germany, each randomly selected. Questionnaires were sent in August 2018 and January 2019, respectively. The answers were compared between GPs and NH staff using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests and χ2-tests. We received 375 GP questionnaires (response: 34%) and 486 NH questionnaires (response: 45%). GPs estimated the proportion of inappropriate transfers higher than NH staff (hospital admissions: 35.0% vs. 25.6%, p??0.0001; emergency department visits: 39.9% vs. 20.9%, p??0.0001). The majority of NH staff and nearly half of the GPs agreed that NH residents do often not benefit from hospital admissions (NHs: 61.4% vs. GPs: 48.8%; p?=?0.0009). Both groups rated almost all potential measures for improvement differently (p??0.0001), however, GPs and NH staff considered most areas to reduce hospital transfers importantly. The two most important measures for GPs were more nursing staff (91.6%) and better communication between nursing staff and GP (90.9%). NH staff considered better care / availability of GP (82.8%) and medical specialists (81.3%) as most important. Both groups rated similarly the importance of explicit advance directives (GPs: 77.2%, NHs: 72.4%; p?=?0.1492). A substantial proportion of hospital transfers from NHs were considered inappropriate. Partly, the ratings of possible areas for improvement differed between GPs and NH staff indicating that both groups seem to pass the responsibility to each other. These findings, however, support the need for interprofessional collaboration.
机译:在护理家庭(NH)居民中,急诊部门和医院入院的访问是常见的,它们与显着的并发症有关。许多这些转移被认为是不合适的。本研究旨在比较普通从业者(GPS)和NH工作人员对居民之间的转移的看法,并说明改进措施。在德国联邦州的1121个GPS中进行了两个横断面研究,在德国联邦州的1121枚GPS中,从德国各地的1069 NHS(最好是护理人员经理)的较低萨克森州和员工中的员工。问卷分别于2018年8月和2019年1月发送。使用描述性统计,Mann-Whitney U测试和χ2-Tests比较了GPS和NH工作人员之间的答案。我们收到了375 GP问卷(响应:34%)和486纳米问卷调查问卷(回应:45%)。 GPS估计了不恰当的转移的比例高于NH工作人员(医院入学:35.0%与25.6%,P?<?0.0001;急诊部门访问:39.9%与20.9%,p?<?0.0001)。大多数NH员工和近一半的GPS同意NH居民常常不会受益于医院入学(NHS:61.4%与GPS:48.8%; P?=?0.0009)。两组均评定几乎所有潜在的改进措施(P?<?0.0001),但GPS和NH工作人员认为大多数区域减少医院转移。 GPS的两个最重要的措施更加护理人员(91.6%)和护理人员和GP之间的更好沟通(90.9%)。 NH工作人员认为GP(82.8%)和医学专家(81.3%)的优惠/可用性是最重要的。两组同样评估了明确的预先指令的重要性(GPS:77.2%,NHS:72.4%; p?= 0.1492)。 NHS的大部分医院转移被认为是不恰当的。部分地区,GPS和NH工作人员可能改善的可能区域的评级表明这两个团体似乎彼此责任。然而,这些调查结果支持需要竞争协作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号