首页> 外文期刊>BMC Endocrine Disorders >Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents detected by continuous glucose monitoring: a multi-center prospective observational study in Croatia
【24h】

Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents detected by continuous glucose monitoring: a multi-center prospective observational study in Croatia

机译:用连续葡萄糖监测检测口服抗血糖药物治疗2型糖尿病患者的低血糖:克罗地亚的多中心前瞻性观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still unsolved issue. The aim of this study was to investigate hypoglycemia in T2DM in participants treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents using different glucose cut-off values and to explore influence of different therapies. This multi-center prospective observational study included participant with T2DM from primary care offices across Croatia treated with antihyperglycemic agents who were monitored using professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device (iPro?2). Hypoglycemia was defined as at least 1% of the monitored period spent in the hypoglycemic range and/or area under the curve of glycemia registered ever under the defined cut-off value. The higher upper limit of blood glucose cut-off value was 3.9?mmol/L (70?mg/dL) and the lower one 3.0?mmol/L (54?mg/dL). Study included 94 participants. Median hemoglobin A1C levels, age, T2DM duration, body mass index, and CGM use duration were 7 (5.8–11.5) %, 65 (40–86) years, 7 (1–36) years, 30.4 (21.3–41.5) kg/m2 and 6 (1–7) days, respectively. Fifty participants were treated with sulfonylurea, primarily gliclazide (84%). The percentage of participant with hypoglycemia based on the higher cut-off value was 42.6% vs. 16% based on the higher cut-off value. The percentage of participant with nocturnal hypoglycemia (23?PM to 06?AM) was significantly lower among participant with hypoglycemia based on the higher cut-off value compared to lower one (7.8% vs. 22.9%). Sulfonylurea treatment did not influence the occurrence of hypoglycemia. Analysis of the data from participants having hypoglycemia based on the lower cut-off value pointed to other possible risk factors for hypoglycemia like prolonged overnight fasting, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and concomitant therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In participant with T2DM treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents hypoglycemia based on the blood glucose cut-off value of 3.9?mmol/L was more prevalent, but with less nocturnal hypoglycemia. Sulfonylurea therapy was not risk factor for hypoglycemia regardless of cut-off value. In participants having hypoglycemia based on the blood glucose cut-off value of 3.0?mmol/L some other possible factors were identified related to concomitant therapy, nutrition and daily habits. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03253237.
机译:2型糖尿病(T2DM)的低血糖仍未解决问题。本研究的目的是在使用不同葡萄糖截止值的口服抗血糖药物治疗的参与者中调查低血糖,使用不同的葡萄糖截止值并探讨不同疗法的影响。这个多中心的观察性研究包括与使用专业连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)设备(IPRO?2)进行监测的克罗地亚治疗的克罗地亚的初级保健办公室的参与者。低血糖定义为在血糖范围内花费的监测期的至少1%,并且在血糖曲线下的糖尿病曲线下注册的曲率曲线下方在定义的截止值下。血糖截止值的较高限值为3.9?mmol / L(70×mg / dl),下一个3.0?mmol / l(54×mg / dl)。研究包括94名参与者。中位血红蛋白A1C水平,年龄,T2DM持续时间,体重指数和CGM使用持续时间为7(5.8-11.5)%,65(40-86)年,7(1-36)年,30.4(21.3-41.5)kg / m2和6(1-7)天。将五十名参与者用磺酰脲治疗,主要是Gliclazide(84%)。基于更高的截止值,基于截止值的基于截止值的低血糖基于截止值的低血糖的参与者的百分比为42.6%。与低血糖基于较高的截止值相比(7.8%与22.9%),对低血糖的参与者的参与者参与者的参与者(23μm到0.6?AM)的百分比显着降低。磺脲类治疗没有影响低血糖的发生。基于较低的截止值的低血糖分析了低血糖的数据分析了低血糖的其他可能危险因素,如延长的过夜禁食,身体活动,醇消耗和伴随血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。在参与者的T2DM用口腔抗血糖药剂治疗的基于血糖截止值3.9的血糖截止值为3.9?mmol / L更普遍,但夜间低血糖较少。无论截止值如何,磺酰脲类疗法对低血糖的危险因素是低血糖。在基于血糖截止值3.0的血糖截止值3.0的参与者中,鉴定了一些其他可能的因素与伴随治疗,营养和日常习惯有关。 ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03253237。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号