首页> 外文期刊>BMC Emergency Medicine >Sensitivity of urinary pathogens for patients discharged from the emergency department compared with the hospital antibiogram
【24h】

Sensitivity of urinary pathogens for patients discharged from the emergency department compared with the hospital antibiogram

机译:与医院抗诊断相比,从急诊部门出院的患者尿病原菌的敏感性

获取原文
           

摘要

Data for hospital antibiograms are typically compiled from all patients, regardless of disposition, demographics and other comorbidities. We hypothesized that the sensitivity patterns for urinary pathogens would differ significantly from the hospital antibiogram in patients that were discharged from the emergency department (ED). We evaluated a retrospective cohort of all adult patients with positive urine cultures treated in the 2016 calendar year at an inner-city academic ED. Positive urine cultures defined by our institution’s microbiology department. Investigators conducted a structured review of an electronic medical record (EMR) to collect demographic, historical and microbiology records. We utilized a one-sample test of proportion to compare the sensitivity of each organism for discharged patients to the hospital published antibiogram. Alpha set at 0.05. During the study period, 414 patients were discharged from the ED and found to have positive urine cultures; 20% age??60?years old, 85% female, 79% Hispanic, 33% diabetic. The most common organisms was E. coli (78%). E. coli was sensitive to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for 59% vs. 58% in our antibiogram (p?=?0.77), Ciprofloxacin 81% vs. 69% (p??0. 001), Nitrofurantoin 96% vs 95%; (p?=?0.25). K. pneumoniae was sensitive to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole 87% vs. 80% in our antibiogram (p?=?0.26), Ciprofloxacin 100% vs. 92% (p?=?0.077), Nitrofurantoin 86% vs 41% (p??0.001). For our predominantly Hispanic study group with a high prevalence of diabetes, we found that our hospital antibiogram had relatively good value in guiding antibiotic therapy though for some organism/antibiotic combinations sensitivities were higher than expected.
机译:医院抗性数据通常从所有患者编制,无论处置,人口统计和其他合并症。我们假设从急诊部门(ED)排出的患者的医院抗诊断中,尿声病原体的敏感性模式会显着差异。我们评估了在内部城市学术编辑的2016年日历年度治疗的所有成年尿培养患者的回顾性群体。我们机构微生物学部门定义的阳性尿培养。调查人员对电子医疗记录(EMR)进行了结构化审查,以收集人口,历史和微生物学纪录。我们利用一个样本的比例测试,以比较每种生物体对出院患者的敏感性的敏感性。 alpha设置为0.05。在研究期间,414名患者从ED中排出并发现有阳性尿培养物; 20%年龄?>?60?岁,女性85%,西班牙裔79%,糖尿病33%。最常见的生物是大肠杆菌(78%)。大肠杆菌对Trimethechokim-磺胺甲恶唑敏感59%的抗体导致58%(p?= 0.77),环丙沙星81%与69%(p?<0.001),硝化urantin 96%vs 95% ; (p?= 0.25)。 K.肺炎群对三甲基巯基磺胺甲氧唑敏感,在我们的抗体诊断中87%与80%敏感(P?= 0.26),加氢氟苯甲酸100%与92%(p?= 0.077),硝化呋喃素86%Vs 41%(P? <?0.001)。对于我们主要具有糖尿病患病率高的西班牙裔学习组,我们发现我们的医院抗生素在引导抗生素治疗中具有相对良好的价值,虽然对于某些生物/抗生素组合敏感性高于预期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号