首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Coping and wellbeing in bereavement: two core outcomes for evaluating bereavement support in palliative care
【24h】

Coping and wellbeing in bereavement: two core outcomes for evaluating bereavement support in palliative care

机译:在丧亲丧亲中的应对与幸福:评估姑息治疗中的丧亲保护的两个核心结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Bereavement support is a core part of palliative care. However, the evidence base is limited by a lack of consistency in the outcomes used to evaluate services and models of support, which makes it difficult to compare approaches. Core Outcome Sets (COS) represent the minimum that should be measured in research into specific conditions or services. The aim of this study was to use a stakeholders’ perspective to develop a COS for evaluating bereavement support for adults in adult palliative care settings. A list of outcomes relevant to bereavement support was created following a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative literature. At an expert workshop 21 stakeholders discussed their views on the most important outcomes and compared these to and critiqued the lists constructed from the review. These lists and discussions informed a two round international DELPHI survey (n?=?240) designed to reach consensus on which outcomes/outcome dimensions should be included in the COS. To prioritise and validate the items emerging from the survey, participants at a subsequent consensus day ranked the relative importance of these items (n?=?23). A final feedback exercise with these consensus day participants was conducted to confirm the selection of outcomes and dimensions. ‘Ability to cope with grief’ and ‘Quality of life and mental wellbeing’ were selected as two core outcomes. Twenty-one different dimensions to explore when assessing these outcomes were also identified. The coping related dimensions have been categorised as: Negative and overwhelming grief; Communication and connectedness; Understanding, accepting and finding meaning in grief; Finding balance between grief and life going forwards; Accessing appropriate support. Those relating to quality of life and wellbeing have been categorised as; Participation in work and/or regular activities; Relationships and social functioning; Positive mental wellbeing and Negative mental and emotional state. This COS outlines a more consistent way forward for bereavement researchers and practitioners, whilst also orientating towards public health and resilience-based approaches to bereavement care. Further work is planned to identify and develop measures which are specific to this core outcome set, and which will facilitate the future comparability of bereavement services and interventions.
机译:Bereavement支持是姑息治疗的核心部分。然而,证据基础受到用于评估服务和支持模式的结果的缺乏一致性,这使得难以比较方法。核心结果组(COS)代表应在研究中测量的最低限度。本研究的目的是利用利益攸关方的观点来开发一个COS,用于评估成人姑息治疗环境中成年人的丧亲保护。在对定量和定性文献的系统审查进行了系统审查之后,创建了与丧亲保护支持相关的结果。在一位专家讲习班21个利益相关者对最重要的成果讨论了他们的看法,并将这些与审查建造的清单批评并批评。这些清单和讨论通知了两个圆形的国际德尔福调查(N?=?240),旨在达成在CO中应包括在哪些结果/结果尺寸的共识。要优先考虑和验证从调查中出现的项目,随后的参与者共识日排名在这些项目的相对重要性(n?=?23)。进行了最终反馈练习与这些共识日参与者进行了确认选择结果和维度。 “应对悲伤的能力”和“生活质量和心理健康”被选为两个核心结果。还确定了在评估这些结果时探索的二十一个不同的尺寸。应对相关尺寸已被分类为:负面和压倒性的悲伤;通信和关联;在悲伤中理解,接受和寻找意义;寻找悲伤与生命之间的平衡;访问适当的支持。有关生活质量和福祉的人已被分类为;参与工作和/或定期活动;关系和社会功能;积极的心理健康与消极的心理和情绪状态。这家COS概述了禁止研究人员和从业者的更一致的前进方向,同时也朝着公共卫生和可弹性的丧亲护理方式定位。计划识别和制定具体对该核心成果组的措施的进一步工作,这将促进丧亲维修服务和干预的未来可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号