首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Marginal and internal fit of full ceramic crowns milled using CADCAM systems on cadaver full arch scans
【24h】

Marginal and internal fit of full ceramic crowns milled using CADCAM systems on cadaver full arch scans

机译:使用CADVER全拱扫描的CADCAM系统铣削的全陶瓷冠的边缘和内部配合

获取原文
           

摘要

Chairside systems are becoming more popular for fabricating full-ceramic single restorations, but there is very little knowledge about the effect of the entire workflow process on restoration fit. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) and the full internal fit (FULL) of all-ceramic crowns made by two chairside systems, Planmeca FIT and CEREC, with detailed and standard mill settings. One upper molar was prepared for an all-ceramic crown in human cadaver maxilla. Full-arch scans were made by Emerald or Omnicam four times each. Twenty-four e.max crowns were designed and milled by the Planmill 30s or 40s or CEREC MCXL mills with either detailed or standard settings. The cadaver tooth was extracted, and each crown was fixed on it and scanned by a high-resolution microCT scanner. The AMD and FULL were measured digitally in mesio-distal and bucco-lingual 2D slices. The actual and predicted times of the milling were also registered. No differences were observed between detailed or standard settings in either system. The AMD was significantly higher with CEREC (132?±?12?μm) than with either Planmill 30s (71?±?6.9?μm) or 40s (78?±?7.7?μm). In standard mode, the FULL was significantly higher with CEREC (224?±?9.6?μm) than with either Planmill 30s (169?±?8.1?μm) or 40s (178?±?8.5?μm). There was no difference between actual and predicted time with the two Planmeca models, but with CEREC, the actual time was significantly higher than the predicted time. The 30s had significantly higher actual and predicted times compared to all other models. Across all models, the average milling time was 7.2?min less in standard mode than in detailed mode. All fit parameters were in an acceptable range. No differences in fit between Planmeca models suggest no effect of spindle number on accuracy. The detailed setting has no improvement in the marginal or internal fit of the restoration, yet it increases milling time.
机译:主席系统越来越受到制造全陶瓷单恢复的普通乐观,但对整个工作流程过程的效果非常了解恢复合适的知识。因此,本研究旨在比较两个主席系统,Planmeca Fit和Cerec的全陶瓷冠的绝对边际差异(AMD)和全内部配合(全部),并提供详细的和标准铣刀。为人尸体颌骨中的全陶瓷冠制备一个上摩尔。全拱扫描由祖母绿或Omnicam进行四次。由Planmill 30s或40s或Cerec MCXL铣刀设计和研磨二十四个E.Max冠,具有详细或标准设置。提取尸体牙齿,每个冠部固定在其上并由高分辨率MicroCT扫描仪扫描。 AMD和Full在Mesio-Dattal和Bucco语言2D切片中以数字方式测量。铣削的实际和预测时间也注册。在任一系统中的详细或标准设置之间没有观察到差异。 AMD与CEREC(132?±12?12?μm)显着高于Planmill 30s(71〜±6.9μm)或40s(78?±7.7μm)。在标准模式下,用CEREC(224→α≤9.6μm)显着高于Planmill 30s(169?±8.1μm)或40s(178?±8.5μm)。实际和预测时间与两个Planmeca模型之间没有差异,但使用CEREC,实际时间明显高于预测的时间。与所有其他型号相比,30年代的实际和预测时间明显高。在所有型号中,标准模式下平均铣削时间比详细模式更少为7.2?最小。所有适合参数都在可接受的范围内。 Planmeca模型之间的适应性没有差异表明主轴编号对精度没有影响。详细的设置在恢复的边缘或内部拟合中没有改善,但它会增加研磨时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号