...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Ophthalmology >Combination of Ranibizumab with macular laser for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: one-year results from a randomized controlled double-blind trial
【24h】

Combination of Ranibizumab with macular laser for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: one-year results from a randomized controlled double-blind trial

机译:ranibizumab与黄斑激光用于黄斑水肿的次级分支视网膜静脉闭塞:随机受控双盲试验的一年结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is not clear whether macular laser combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can reduce the number of anti-VEGF injections in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Our study aimed to investigate the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab with or without macular laser for ME secondary to BRVO and its associated number of anti-VEGF injections. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, monocentric trial.80 patients were enrolled and 64 patients fulfilled the study requirements. All patients received a minimum of 3 initial monthly ranibizumab injections, pro re nata (PRN) dosing thereafter VA and CRT stabilization criteria-driven PRN treatment. Laser was given 7?days after third ranibizumab injection in ranibizumab with laser group. The follow-up time of this study was 1 year. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement, central retinal thickness (CRT) reduction and number of injections of patients were compared between two groups. T-test, non-parametric Wilcoxon test and chis-square tests were adopted for between-group comparisons. Thirty patients received intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5?mg alone and 34 patients received intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5?mg with macular laser. At 52?week, BCVA increased significantly and CRT decreased significantly in both groups (P 0.05). Our study suggests that ranibizumab combined with macular laser is effective in the treatment of ME secondary to BRVO after 1 year of treatment with 3?+?PRN regimen. However, combination of macular grid photocoagulation showed no beneficial anatomical or functional effect during follow-up period, nor did it reduce the number of ranibizumab injections, either in ischemic group or non-ischemic group. We suggest that there is no need to combine macular grid photocoagulation in the treatment of ME secondary to BRVO in the future. Clinical Trials NCT03054766. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov.Prospectively registered.
机译:目前尚不清楚黄兰激光是否结合抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)可以减少抗VEGF注射的次数,治疗次级的黄斑水肿(ME)次级静脉闭塞(BRVO)。我们的研究旨在探讨玻璃体内Ranibizumab与Marular激光器的影响,对MERMular激光进行继发于BRVO及其相关数量的抗VEGF注射。这是一项前瞻性,随机的双盲,单眼试验.80患者注册,64名患者满足了研究要求。所有患者均收到至少3个初始月的Ranibizumab注射液,Pro Rea(PRN),其后给药,然后加入VA和CRT稳定标准驱动的PRN处理。激光给出7.在Ranibizumab中的第三次Ranibizumab与激光组后的一天。本研究的后续时间为1年。比较两组比较了最佳矫正视力(BCVA)改进,中央视网膜厚度(CRT)减少和注射次数。采用T检验,非参数核苷酸试验和基于组比较之间的CHIS-Square测试。三十名患者接受术术术术雷尼兹替卢比0.5?Mg单独,34名患者接受术治疗术术术术0.5Ω·镁,具有黄斑激光。在52个?星期,BCVA在两组中显着增加,CRT显着下降(P 0.05)。我们的研究表明,Ranibizumab与黄斑激光相结合在用3次治疗后的3次治疗后对ME中的继发于BRVO治疗。然而,黄斑栅格光凝物的组合在随访期间显示出没有有益的解剖学或功能效果,也没有降低缺血组或非缺血组的Ranibizumab注射的数量。我们认为,在未来,不需要将黄斑网格光凝物结合在我对BRVO中的继发性。临床试验NCT03054766。 https://register.clinicalTrials.gov.Propective。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号