...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Efficacy of Indian polyvalent snake antivenoms against Sri Lankan snake venoms: lethality studies or clinically focussed in vitro studies
【24h】

Efficacy of Indian polyvalent snake antivenoms against Sri Lankan snake venoms: lethality studies or clinically focussed in vitro studies

机译:印度多价蛇抗静物对斯里兰卡蛇毒液的疗效:致死性研究或临床上专注的体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

In vitro antivenom efficacy studies were compared to rodent lethality studies to test two Indian snake antivenoms (VINS and BHARAT) against four Sri Lankan snakes. In vitro efficacy was tested at venom concentrations consistent with human envenoming. Efficacy was compared statistically for one batch from each manufacturer where multiple vials were available. In binding studies EC50 for all VINS antivenoms were less than BHARAT for D. russelii [553?μg/mL vs. 1371?μg/mL;p?=?0.016), but were greater for VINS antivenoms compared to BHARAT for N. naja [336?μg/mL vs. 70?μg/mL;p??0.0001]. EC50 of both antivenoms was only slighty different for E. carinatus and B. caeruleus. For procoagulant activity neutralisation, the EC50 was lower for VINS compared to BHARAT - 60?μg/mL vs. 176?μg/mL (p??0.0001) for Russell's viper and 357?μg/mL vs. 6906μg/mL (p??0.0001) for Saw-scaled viper. Only VINS antivenom neutralized in vitro neurotoxicity of krait venom. Both antivenoms partially neutralized cobra and didn't neutralize Russell's viper neurotoxicity. Lethality studies found no statistically significant difference in ED50 values between VINS and BHARAT antivenoms. VINS antivenoms appeared superior to BHARAT at concentrations equivalent to administering 10 vials antivenom, based on binding and neutralisation studies. Lethality studies were inconsistent suggesting rodent death may not measure relevant efficacy outcomes in humans.
机译:将体外抗血液疗效研究与啮齿动物的致死性研究进行比较,以测试两个印度蛇抗静物(Vins和Bharat)对抗四个斯里兰卡蛇。在与人体envenoming一致的毒液浓度下测试体外功效。统计从每个制造商统计比较疗效,其中多个小瓶可获得。在结合研究中,所有vINS抗静物的EC50小于D. Russelii的Bharat [553吗?μg/ ml; p?= 0.016),但与N. naja的Bharat相比,vins antivenols更大。 [336吗?μg/ ml与70≤μg/ ml; p?<0.0001]。两种抗静电子的EC50仅为E. carinatus和B. caeruleus的略微不同。对于russell毒品的Bharat - 60·μg/ ml与357.μg/ ml(p?<0.0001)和357Ω·μg/ ml与6906μg/ ml(p锯鳞片Viper的<?0.0001)。只有vins antivenom中和克拉毒液的体外神经毒性。两种抗静肌部分中和眼镜蛇,并没有中和罗素的毒蛇神经毒性。致死性研究发现VINS和BHARAT抗静电子之间的ED50值没有统计学显着差异。基于结合和中和研究,vins抗静物在相当于给药10个小瓶抗动物的浓度上出现。致死性研究表明啮齿动物死亡可能无法衡量人类的相关疗效结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号