首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology >Involvement of occupational physicians in the management of MRSA-colonised healthcare workers in Germany – a survey
【24h】

Involvement of occupational physicians in the management of MRSA-colonised healthcare workers in Germany – a survey

机译:职业医师参与德国MRSA殖民医疗保健工人管理 - 一项调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Colonisation of healthcare workers (HCWs) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains (MRSA) is a challenge for any healthcare facility. Persistent carriage of MRSA among HCWs causes special problems, particularly in occupational-medical care. German occupational physicians responsible for healthcare facilities were therefore asked about their experience in managing MRSA-colonised HCWs. Methods In May 2012, 549 occupational physicians were asked in writing about in-house management of MRSA-colonised HCWs. The semi-standardised survey form contained questions about collaboration between the infection control team and the occupational physician, the involvement of the occupational physician in in-house management of MRSA carriers and the number of persistently colonised HCWs in 2011. The answers were intended to apply to the largest facility cared for by the occupational physician. Results 207 occupational physicians took part in the survey (response rate 38%). In 2011, 73 (35%) occupational physicians were responsible for the occupational-medical management of an average of four MRSA-colonised HCWs. Eleven doctors (5.3% of 207) managed a total of 17 persistently colonised HCWs. One of these 17 employees was dismissed. In the case of MRSA carriage among HCWs, most occupational physicians cooperated with the infection control team (77%) and 39% of occupational physicians were responsible for the occupational-medical management of the affected carrier. 65% of facilities had specified policies for the management of MRSA-colonised HCWs. After the first MRSA-positive screening result, 79% of facilities attempt to decolonise the affected employee. In 6% of facilities, the colonised HCWs were excluded from work while receiving decolonisation treatment. In 54% of facilities, infection control policies demand the removal of MRSA carriers from patient care. Conclusions Not all facilities have policies for the management of MRSA-colonised HCWs and there are major differences in occupational consequences for the affected HCWs. In order to protect both the employees and the patients, standards for the in-house management of MRSA colonisation in HCWs should be developed.
机译:背景技术耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株(MRSA)的医疗保健工人(HCWS)是对任何医疗机构的挑战。 HCW中MRSA的持续运输导致特殊问题,特别是在职业医疗中。因此,德国职业医师负责医疗保健设施的经验,他们在管理MRSA-殖民HCWS方面的经验。方法在2012年5月,职业医师们以书面殖民地管理的内部管理提出了549年的职业医师。半标准化的调查表格包含关于感染控制团队和职业医师之间的合作的问题,职业医师参与MRSA运营商的内部管理和2011年持续殖民HCW的数量。旨在申请到职业医师所关心的最大设施。结果207职业医师参加了调查(响应率38%)。 2011年,73名(35%)职业医师负责职业医学管理,平均四个MRSA-殖民HCWS。 11名医生(5.3%的5.3%)总共管理了17个持续殖民的HCW。这17名员工中的一个被驳回了。在HCW的MRSA运输的情况下,大多数职业医师与感染控制团队(77%)合作(77%)和39%的职业医师负责受影响载体的职业医疗管理。 65%的设施有规定的MRSA-殖民HCW的管理政策。在第一次MRSA阳性筛查结果之后,79%的设施试图将受影响的员工解脱出来。在6%的设施中,殖民化的HCW在接受非殖民化治疗时被排除在工作之外。在54%的设施中,感染控制政策要求从患者护理中移除MRSA载体。结论并非所有设施都有政策,用于管理MRSA-殖民地HCW,对受影响的HCW有关的职业后果存在重大差异。为了保护员工和患者,应制定HCW中MRSA殖民化内部管理的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号