...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Senior Internal Medicine Residents' Confidence with Essential Topics in Evidence-Based Medicine Taught During Internship
【24h】

Senior Internal Medicine Residents' Confidence with Essential Topics in Evidence-Based Medicine Taught During Internship

机译:高级内科居民在实习期间教导的基于证据的基础医学的信心

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundFew studies have examined residents' retained knowledge and confidence regarding essential evidence-based medicine (EBM) topics.ObjectiveTo compare postgraduate year-3 (PGY-3) residents' confidence with EBM topics taught during internship with that of PGY-1 residents before and after exposure to an EBM curriculum.MethodsAll residents participated in an EBM curriculum during their intern year. We surveyed residents in 2009. PGY-1 residents completed a Likert-scale type survey (which included questions from the validated Berlin questionnaire and others, developed based on input from local EBM experts). We administered the Berlin questionnaire to a subset of PGY-3 residents.ResultsForty-five PGY-3 (88%; n ?=? 51) and 42 PGY-1 (91%; n ?=? 46) residents completed the survey. Compared with PGY-1 residents pre-curriculum, PGY-3 residents were significantly more confident in their knowledge of pre- and posttest probability (mean difference, 1.14; P ?=? .002), number needed to harm (mean difference, 1.09; P ?=? .002), likelihood ratio (mean difference, 1.01; P ?=? .003), formulation of a focused clinical question (mean difference, 0.98; P ?=? .001), and critical appraisal of therapy articles (mean difference, 0.91; P ?=? .002). Perceived confidence was significantly lower for PGY-3 than post-curriculum PGY-1 residents on relative risk (mean difference, ?0.86; P ?=? .002), study design for prognosis questions (mean difference, ?0.75; P ?=? .004), number needed to harm (mean difference, ?0.67; P ?=? .01), ability to critically appraise systematic reviews (mean difference, ?0.65, P ?=? .009), and retrieval of evidence (mean difference, ?0.56; P ?=? .008), among others. There was no relationship between confidence with and actual knowledge of EBM topics.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate lower confidence among PGY-3 than among PGY-1 internal medicine residents for several EBM topics. PGY-3 residents demonstrated poor knowledge of several core topics taught during internship. Longitudinal EBM curricula throughout residency 5 help reinforce residents' EBM knowledge and their confidence.
机译:背景日复历研究已经审查了居民的保留知识和关于基于基本证据(EBM)主题的信心.Bobjectiveto比较研究生年3(PGY-3)居民与在实习期间与PGGY-1居民在实习期间教授的eBM主题的信心接触EBM课程后..在实习生期间,在实习生期间参加了EBM课程的居民。我们在2009年进行了调查的居民.PGGY-1居民完成了李克特级类型调查(其中包括验证的柏林问卷和其他人的问题,根据当地EBM专家的意见开发)。我们将柏林调查问卷管理到PGY-3居民的一部分。结果令 - 五个PGY-3(88%; N?=?51)和42 PGY-1(91%; N?=?46)居民完成了调查。与PGY-1居民的课程相比,PGY-3居民对他们对预先和最概率的知识进行了很大的信心(平均差异,1.14; p?=?.002),伤害所需的数量(平均差异,1.09 ; p?=?.002),似然比(平均差异,1.01; p?=β=Δ.003),重点临床问题的制定(平均差异,0.98; p?=Δ.001)和批判性评估文章(平均差异,0.91; p?=?.002)。 PGY-3比课程后3居民对相对风险的职位(平均差异,Δ0.86;p≤002),预后问题的研究设计(平均差异,?0.75; p?0.75; p?= ?.004),伤害所需的数量(平均差异,?0.67; p?.01),批判性评估的能力(平均差异,?0.65,p?= .009)和检索证据(平均差异,?0.56; p?=?.008),等。对ebm主题的信心和实际知识之间没有关系.Conclusionsour调查结果表明PGY-3之间的信心低于几个EBM主题的PGY-1内科居民。 PGY-3居民展示了实习期间教授的几个核心主题的知识。纵向EBM课程整个居住5 5帮助加强居民的EBM知识及其信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号