...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Variability and Reproducibility of 3 rd -generation dual-source dynamic volume perfusion CT Parameters in Comparison to MR-perfusion Parameters in Rectal Cancer
【24h】

Variability and Reproducibility of 3 rd -generation dual-source dynamic volume perfusion CT Parameters in Comparison to MR-perfusion Parameters in Rectal Cancer

机译:与直肠癌MR灌注参数相比,第三代双源动态容积灌注CT参数的变异性和可重复性

获取原文
           

摘要

To compare in patients with untreated rectal cancer quantitative perfusion parameters calculated from 3rd-generation dual-source dynamic volume perfusion CT (dVPCT) with 3-Tesla-MR-perfusion with regard to data variability and tumour differentiation. In MR-perfusion, plasma flow (PF), plasma volume (PV) and mean transit time (MTT) were assessed in two measurements (M1 and M2) by the same reader. In dVPCT, blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), MTT and permeability (PERM) were assessed respectively. CT dose values were calculated. 20 patients (60?±?13 years) were analysed. Intra-individual and intra-reader variability of duplicate MR-perfusion measurements was higher compared to duplicate dVPCT measurements. dVPCT-derived BF, BV and PERM could differentiate between tumour and normal rectal wall (significance level for M1 and M2, respectively, regarding BF: p??0.0001*/0.0001*; BV: p??0.0001*/0.0001*; MTT: p?=?0.93/0.39; PERM: p??0.0001*/0.0001*), with MR-perfusion this was true for PF and PV (p-values M1/M2 for PF: p?=?0.04*/0.01*; PV: p?=?0.002*/0.003*; MTT: p?=?0.70/0.27*). Mean effective dose of CT-staging incl. dVPCT was 29?±?6?mSv (20?±?5?mSv for dVPCT alone). In conclusion, dVPCT has a lower data variability than MR-perfusion while both dVPCT and MR-perfusion could differentiate tumour tissue from normal rectal wall. With 3rd-generation dual-source CT dVPCT could be included in a standard CT-staging without exceeding national dose reference values.
机译:为了比较未经治疗的直肠癌患者的定量灌注参数,这些参数是根据第三代双源动态体积灌注CT(dVPCT)与3-Tesla-MR灌注计算得出的数据变异性和肿瘤分化程度。在MR灌注中,由同一读者在两次测量(M1和M2)中评估血浆流量(PF),血浆体积(PV)和平均通过时间(MTT)。在dVPCT中,分别评估了血流量(BF),血容量(BV),MTT和通透性(PERM)。计算CT剂量值。分析了20例患者(60±±13岁)。与重复的dVPCT测量相比,重复的MR灌注测量的个体内和读者内部变异性更高。 dVPCT衍生的BF,BV和PERM可以区分肿瘤和正常直肠壁(对于BF:p1 <?0.0001 * / 0.0001 *; BV:p?<?0.0001 * / 0.0001 *,分别对M1和M2具有显着性意义。 ; MTT:p≤0.93/ 0.39; PERM:p≤0.0001* / 0.0001 *),MR灌注对于PF和PV是正确的(PF的p值为M1 / M2:p = 0.04) * / 0.01 *; PV:p≥0.002* / 0.003 *; MTT:p≥0.70/ 0.27 *)。 CT分期的平均有效剂量,包括dVPCT为29≤±6≤mSv(仅dVPCT为20≤±5≤mSv)。总之,dVPCT的数据变异性低于MR灌注,而dVPCT和MR灌注均可将肿瘤组织与正常直肠壁区分开。使用第三代双源CT dVPCT可以包含在标准CT分级中,而不会超出国家剂量参考值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号