Impact of erroneous meal insulin bolus with dual-hormone artificial pancreas using a simplified bolus strategy - A randomized controlled trial

摘要

Postprandial glucose control remains challenging for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). A simplified meal bolus approach with a dual-hormone (insulin and glucagon) closed-loop system (DH-CLS) has been tested; yet, the impact of categorization errors with this strategy is unknown. The objective was to compare, in a randomized controlled inpatient trial, DH-CLS with the simplified meal bolus approach for two different meals properly categorized or overestimated. We tested, in patients with T1D, the simplified strategy with two standardized breakfasts (n?=?10 per meal) adequately categorized or overestimated: (1) 75?g and (2) 45?g of carbohydrate. No difference was observed for percentage of time 4.0?mmol/L over a 4-hour post-meal period (primary outcome; median [IQR]: 0[0–0] vs. 0[0–0] for both comparisons, p?=?0.47 and 0.31 for the 75?g and 45?g meals, respectively). Despite higher meal insulin boluses with overestimation for both meals (9.2 [8.2–9.6] vs. 8.1 [7.3–9.1] U and 8.4 [7.2–10.4] vs. 4.8 [3.7–5.6] U; p??0.05), mean glycemia, percentage of time in target range and glucagon infusion did not differ. Additional scenarios were tested in silico with comparable results. These results suggest that the DH-CLS with a simplified meal bolus calculation is probably able to avoid hypoglycemia in the event of meal size misclassification.