...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Lying down frequency as a discomfort index in heat stressed Holstein bull calves
【24h】

Lying down frequency as a discomfort index in heat stressed Holstein bull calves

机译:躺下频率作为热应激荷斯坦牛犊牛的不适指数

获取原文
           

摘要

Changes in lying behaviour in response to extreme ambient temperatures have not been examined in dairy calves so far. In this study, lying time, and frequency of lying down were investigated in shaded (n?=?8) and non-shaded (n?=?8) Holstein bull calves during a 5-d period [temperature, average/max (°C); Day 1 (control, all calves shaded): 22.9/29.4, Day 2 (heat stress day): 28.3/38.8, Day 3: 26.2/33.5, Day 4: 23.7/28.7, and Day 5: 21.2/24.7]. The thermal environment around the calves was characterized by the temperature–humidity index (THI). A three-dimension accelerometer was used to record posture of the calves and lying time and lying down frequency were analysed with 4-h sampling intervals. On Day 1 no differences were found in THI between the shaded and non-shaded environments. On Days 2, 3 and 4 maximal and average THI were higher in the shaded than those recorded for the non-shaded environment. On Day5 no significant differences in THI were observed between calf environments. A similar diurnal pattern of lying time and lying down frequency was observed in both groups. Lying times were shorter during the afternoon (P?=?0.003); however, no group differences were found in lying time (P?=?0.551). During the daytime (between 8:00 and 20:00), the frequency of lying down was 50, 33, and 41% higher, respectively, than during the nighttime on Days 2, 3 and 4 (P??0.001, P?=?0.011, and P??0.001). On the heat stress day, non-shaded calves changed posture 88.4 and 76.6% more often than shaded ones between 8:00 and 12:00 and 12:00 and 16:00, respectively (P??0.001 for both intervals). Similar group differences were observed for Day 3 between 8:00 and 12:00 (71.2%) and Day 4 between 12:00 and 16:00 (76.6%), respectively (P?=?0.003, and P?=?0.001). On Day 5, there was no difference between groups (P?=?0.732). As indicated by our results, heat stress causes changes in lying down frequency and lying time in dairy calves. Supplemental shading reduces discomfort as indicated by lying down frequency, but not by lying time.
机译:迄今为止,尚未在乳牛犊中检查过响应极端环境温度的躺卧行为的变化。在这项研究中,研究了在5 d时段内荷斯坦公牛犊(n?=?8)和非阴影(n?=?8)的躺卧时间和躺下频率[温度,平均值/最大值( °C);第1天(对照,所有小牛都被遮蔽):22.9 / 29.4,第2天(热应激日):28.3 / 38.8,第3天:26.2 / 33.5,第4天:23.7 / 28.7,和第5天:21.2 / 24.7]。犊牛周围的热环境的特征是温湿度指数(THI)。使用三维加速度计记录小腿的姿势,并以4小时的采样间隔分析躺卧时间和躺卧频率。在第1天,阴影和非阴影环境之间的THI均未发现差异。在第2、3和4天,阴影下的最大THI和平均THI高于非阴影环境下记录的THI。在第5天,小牛环境之间未观察到THI的显着差异。两组均观察到类似的躺卧时间和躺卧频率的昼夜模式。下午的躺卧时间较短(P = 0.003)。但是,在躺时间上没有发现组间差异(P≥0.551)。在白天(8:00至20:00之间),与第二天,第三天和第四天的夜间相比,躺下的频率分别高出50%,33%和41%(P <0.001,P α= 0.011,P <0.001。在热应激日,无阴影的犊牛在8:00和12:00之间以及在12:00和16:00之间的变化分别比有阴影的犊牛更频繁地改变姿势88.4和76.6%(两个时间间隔的P <0.001)。第3天在8:00和12:00之间(71.2%)和第4天在12:00和16:00之间(76.6%)观察到相似的组差异(P <= 0.003,P <= 0.001)。 )。在第5天,各组之间没有差异(P≥0.732)。如我们的结果所示,热应激导致乳牛犊的产蛋频率和产蛋时间发生变化。补充阴影可以减少不适感,如躺下的频率,而不是躺下的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号