...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the American Physical Society >APS -APS March Meeting 2017 - Event - How distinguishable are two quantum processes? a.k.a. “What is the error rate of a quantum gate?”
【24h】

APS -APS March Meeting 2017 - Event - How distinguishable are two quantum processes? a.k.a. “What is the error rate of a quantum gate?”

机译:APS -APS 2017年3月会议-活动-两个量子过程有何区别?又称“量子门的错误率是多少?”

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I will try to convince you that the two titles of this talk are, in fact, synonymous — that “error rate” and “distinguishability of quantum processes” are the same thing. Whether or not I succeed, I will go on to discuss (1) the various ways that this has been quantified, (2) the state of the art in doing so, and (3) why I’m not (and you shouldn’t be) satisfied. Having spent most of my time just establishing what the “right” problem is, I will then propose to solve it by sandwiching “distinguishability” between “distillable distinguishability” and “distinguishability of formation”. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, I’ll prove that the diamond norm is not always the right measure of distinguishability (or even close to it!). I will then do a 180-degree turn and argue that for most of the case that we care about, the diamond norm is a good measure of distinguishability, and finally conclude with another 180-degree turn in which I argue that maybe it’s not.
机译:我将尝试说服您,本次演讲的两个标题实际上是同义词-“错误率”和“量子过程的可区分性”是同一回事。无论我是否成功,我都会继续讨论(1)量化量化的各种方式,(2)量化的最新状态,以及(3)为什么我不量化(您不应该这样做)满足)。我花了大部分时间来确定“正确的”问题是什么之后,我将建议通过将“可区分性”与“地层可区分性”之间夹着“可区分性”来解决。为了证明这种方法的实用性,我将证明钻石规范并非总是可分辨性(甚至接近它)的正确度量。然后,我将进行180度转弯,并指出在我们关注的大多数情况下,钻石规范是衡量可分辨性的好方法,最后我得出另一个180度转弯的结论,我认为可能并非如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号