...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Braking bad: Arousal influences the visual guidance of braking
【24h】

Braking bad: Arousal influences the visual guidance of braking

机译:坏坏:唤醒会影响制动的视觉引导

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Arousal has been shown to influence perceptual judgments as well as the execution of online motor control (e.g., as in the case of choking under pressure). The current study investigated whether arousal also influences the online control of a common visually-guided action over time. Participants performed either an emergency (Experiment 1) or regulated (Experiment 2) braking task with the goal of stopping before colliding with a target. For the emergency braking task, participants applied maximum braking pressure and once braking pressure was applied it could not be released. For regulated braking, participants were able to adjust braking pressure as needed over time. Participants performed one braking task after arousal induction or not. We were primarily interested in testing the hypothesis of whether arousal altered the calibration between visual information and action execution. We hypothesized that arousal would indeed act as a soft constraint on motor control (Harrison, Frank, & Turvey, 2016). Behaviorally, we hypothesized that arousal would lead to faster initiation of braking and less crashing, by influencing the perceptual-motor calibration of braking with respect to visual information. Results from emergency braking supported our hypotheses a?? anxious participants initiated braking sooner and crashed less often. However, when performing regulated braking, anxious participants initiated braking sooner but crashed more often. Overall, the results demonstrated that participants were more conservative in their braking, but that this actually led to a greater chance of crashing when braking was continuously regulated because of their greater reliance on current braking. These results imply that emotions act to alter the calibration between perception and action. Future work may benefit from integrating continuous, physiological indicators of emotional states.
机译:已经证明,唤醒会影响感知判断以及在线运动控制的执行(例如,在压力下窒息的情况下)。当前的研究调查了唤醒是否还会随着时间影响在线视觉引导动作的在线控制。参与者执行了紧急(实验1)或有规律的(实验2)制动任务,目标是在与目标碰撞之前停止。对于紧急制动任务,参与者施加了最大制动压力,一旦施加了制动压力就无法释放。对于有规律的制动,参与者可以根据需要随时调整制动压力。参加者是否在唤醒后执行一项制动任务。我们主要对检验唤醒是否会改变视觉信息和动作执行之间的校准这一假设感兴趣。我们假设唤醒确实是对运动控制的软约束(Harrison,Frank和Turvey,2016年)。从行为上讲,我们假设唤醒会通过影响视觉信息对制动的感知马达校准来导致更快的制动启动和更少的碰撞。紧急制动的结果支持了我们的假设a?焦虑的参与者较早地开始制动,而撞车的频率降低了。然而,当执行有规律的制动时,焦虑的参与者较早地开始制动,但撞车的频率更高。总体而言,结果表明,参与者在制动时更为保守,但是实际上,由于他们对当前制动的依赖性更大,因此在连续调节制动时实际上会导致碰撞的可能性更大。这些结果表明,情绪的作用是改变感知和行动之间的标度。整合情绪状态的连续生理指标可能会有益于未来的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号