首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >The impact of long-term memory based attentional control settings on spatial and non-spatial components of attention
【24h】

The impact of long-term memory based attentional control settings on spatial and non-spatial components of attention

机译:基于长期记忆的注意力控制设置对注意力的空间和非空间成分的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

In recent work we demonstrated that long-term memory can guide the capture of visual spatial attention. Specifically, when participants look for any of a number of task-relevant objects in their visual environment, they adopt attentional control settings (ACSs) based on representations of the target objects in episodic long-term memory. With these ACSs implemented, cues in an attention cueing task only capture visual spatial attention when they match targets in memory. In the present study we investigated how contingent cueing is affected by varying memory demands. In Experiment 1 participants studied 2, 4, 8, or 16 images of visual objects (set size was manipulated across blocks); these objects were then designated as targets in a subsequent cueing task. Specifically, participants monitored two spatial locations for the appearance of studied objects; shortly beforehand, one of the two locations was cued by either a studied or non-studied object. We observed differences between studied and non-studied cueing effects (ie., an effect of ACSs), and no differences in cueing effects across set size; however response times (RTs) appeared to be influenced by forward masking on cued trials. We examined masking in Experiment 2 by comparing trials with no cues, two studied cues, or two non-studied cues across set sizes. Because both target locations were cued (or not), differences between conditions are unlikely to reflect spatial attention, but should reveal masking effects. Consistent with masking, participants were significantly faster on no-cue trials versus non-studied-cue trials. Interestingly, RTs were even slower for studied-cue trials, and this effect increased with set size. These data provide evidence that episodic-contingent cueing is unaffected by set size, and that studied cues have an additional, non-spatial effect on RTs. That this later effect is mediated by set size, suggests it may be an effect of reflexive long-term memory retrieval on perception.
机译:在最近的工作中,我们证明了长期记忆可以指导视觉空间注意力的捕获。具体地说,当参与者在其视觉环境中寻找许多与任务相关的对象中的任何一个时,他们都会根据情节性长期记忆中目标对象的表示采用注意控制设置(ACS)。通过实施这些ACS,注意力提示任务中的提示仅在它们与内存中的目标匹配时才捕获视觉空间注意。在本研究中,我们调查了意外提示如何受到变化的记忆需求的影响。在实验1中,参与者研究了视觉对象的2、4、8或16个图像(集合大小在各个块之间进行操作);然后将这些对象指定为后续提示任务中的目标。具体地说,参与者监视了两个空间位置以观察被研究对象的外观。不久之前,两个位置之一被研究对象或未研究对象提示。我们观察到研究的和未研究的提示效果之间的差异(即ACS的效果),并且整个设定范围内的提示效果没有差异。但是,在提示性试验中,响应时间(RTs)似乎受到前向掩盖的影响。我们通过比较没有线索,两个已研究线索或两个未研究线索的试验来检查实验2中的掩盖,这些线索跨越集合大小。因为两个目标位置都被提示(或不提示),所以条件之间的差异不太可能反映空间注意力,但应显示掩盖效果。与掩蔽一致,无提示试验的参与者明显高于无研究提示的参与者。有趣的是,对于提示研究而言,放疗的速度甚至更慢,并且这种效果随着设定的大小而增加。这些数据提供了证据,情节性线索不受设定大小的影响,并且研究的线索对RTs具有额外的非空间影响。后来的这种影响是由集合大小介导的,表明它可能是反思性长期记忆检索对知觉的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号