...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Illusory reversal of temporal order around the time of visual disruptions
【24h】

Illusory reversal of temporal order around the time of visual disruptions

机译:视觉障碍时的时间顺序幻象逆转

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

How does the brain maintain a stable, continuous perceptual experience in the face of large visual disruptions such as those frequently occurring during blinks and eye movements? Saccadic remapping, a predictive shift in neuronal receptive fields around the time of saccades, has been proposed as an essential neuronal mechanism. In turn, saccadic remapping has been linked to a set of perisaccadic illusions, whereby stimuli flashed briefly around the time of a saccade are mislocalized in space and time. In a recent study, Zimmermann et al. (J Neurophysiol 2014) broadly reproduced similar spatial and temporal mislocalization patterns when the saccade was replaced by a full-field masking interruption. Rather than saccadic compensation alone, such illusions must be due to a more general updating process linking targets of interest across visual interruptions. In this study, we focus more fully on temporal consequences of visual disruptions. Two vertical bars were presented at varying stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOA: -20 to 160 ms in 10 ms increments, furthest vs nearest stimulus), and a full field mask presented at one of three intervals relative to the near stimulus (50, 100 and 150 ms), along with an unmasked condition. Subjects (N=8) maintained fixation throughout the trial, and reported the order in which the two bars appeared. When the second stimulus was presented close to the time of the mask, subjects often reported (30 to 40% of trials on average) that it appeared before the first stimulus, even when the SOA was as large as 150 ms. In a second experiment in which subjects (N=6) also reported response confidence, we obtained similar results analysing only a??confidenta?? responses, indicative of an actual perceptual reversal rather than increased perceptual uncertainty. We offer a speculative explanation in terms of sequential processing of discrete events, and link this to recent results on neuronal oscillations.
机译:面对大范围的视觉障碍(例如眨眼和眼球运动中经常发生的视觉障碍),大脑如何保持稳定,连续的感知体验?跳音重映射,即扫视前后神经元接受域的预测性移位,已被提出作为基本的神经元机制。反过来,将眼跳重新映射与一系列眼周幻觉相关联,从而在扫视时短暂闪烁的刺激在空间和时间上是错误的。在最近的研究中,Zimmermann等人。 (J Neurophysiol 2014)广泛地复制了类似的时空定位错误模式,即扫视被全视野掩蔽中断所取代。并非仅凭行补偿,这种错觉就必须归因于更广泛的更新过程,将感兴趣的目标跨视觉中断连接在一起。在这项研究中,我们将更全面地关注视觉障碍的时间后果。两个垂直条以不同的刺激发作异步出现(SOA:-20至160 ms,以10 ms为增量,最远与最接近刺激),并以相对于近刺激的三个间隔之一呈现全场遮罩(50,100和150毫秒),以及未屏蔽的条件。在整个试验过程中,受试者(N = 8)保持固定状态,并报告了两个横条出现的顺序。当第二次刺激接近面罩时出现时,受试者经常报告(平均30%至40%的试验)它出现在第一次刺激之前,即使SOA长达150 ms。在第二个实验中,受试者(N = 6)也报告了反应的置信度,我们只分析了“信心”?响应,指示实际的感知逆转而不是增加的感知不确定性。我们对离散事件的顺序处理提供了一种推测性的解释,并将其与神经元振荡的最新结果联系起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号