...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Mislocalizations in saccadic and mask-induced suppression of displacement
【24h】

Mislocalizations in saccadic and mask-induced suppression of displacement

机译:眼跳和面罩引起的位移抑制中的定位错误

获取原文

摘要

'Saccadic suppression of displacement' (e.g., Deubel, Schneider, & Bridgeman, 1996) denotes a difficulty in discriminating small 'jumps' (displacements) of a visual target when these jumps occur during a saccadic eye movement. The effect is supposed to reflect some aspect of spatial updating across saccades. More specifically, it is assumed to result from the necessity to compare pre- to post-saccadic coordinates. Recently, we have reported a similar difficulty in a condition without saccades, when the jump was obscured by a full-screen pattern mask (Zimmermann, Born, Fink, & Cavanagh, 2014). We suggested that, rather than spatial updating, saccadic suppression of displacement may also primarily reflect the saccade's masking effect on the visual input stream. We further hypothesized that masking may cause an underestimation in the perceived size of the target jump. Here, instead of using the classic binary response mode ('leftward or rightward jump?'), participants were asked to precisely indicate the target's perceived starting position by mouse click. In accordance with a smaller perceived jump, the initial target position was systematically mislocalized towards the target's final position in both mask and saccade conditions. The systematic bias increased with larger target jumps, reminiscent of the phenomenon of saccadic or mask-induced compression of space (Ross, Morrone, & Burr, 1997; Zimmermann et al., 2014). In contrast, in a control condition without saccades or masks, small displacement sizes ( 1 deg) were slightly overestimated. Finally, when a short blank interval between the disappearance of the target at its initial position and its reappearance at the displaced position was introduced, no systematic mislocalizations occurred, suggesting that the effect depends on a critical time window for integration of spatial positions, again reminiscent of the saccadic compression window. These results are further evidence for a common mechanism underlying saccadic and mask-induced mislocalization and suppression effects.
机译:``突然抑制位移''(例如Deubel,Schneider和Bridgeman,1996)表示当在视力移动过程中发生这些跳跃时,很难区分视觉目标的小``跳跃''(位移)。该效果被认为反映了扫视空间更新的某些方面。更具体地,假定是由于需要比较s声前后的坐标。最近,我们报道了在没有扫视的情况下的类似困难,当全屏模式蒙版遮挡了跳跃时(Zimmermann,Born,Fink和Cavanagh,2014年)。我们建议,代替空间更新,以位移方式进行书acc抑制可能还主要反映了扫视对视觉输入流的掩蔽效果。我们进一步假设掩蔽可能导致目标跳跃的感知大小被低估。在这里,不是使用经典的二进制响应模式(“向左跳还是向右跳?”),而是要求参与者通过单击鼠标来精确指示目标的感知起始位置。根据较小的感知跳跃,在遮罩和扫视条件下,初始目标位置都会系统地错误地定位到目标的最终位置。随着目标跳跃的增加,系统的偏差会增加,让人联想到由跳动或面具引起的空间压缩现象(Ross,Morrone和Burr,1997; Zimmermann等,2014)。相反,在没有扫视镜或掩膜的控制条件下,小位移尺寸(<1度)被略微高估了。最后,当目标在其初始位置的消失与在位移位置的重新出现之间的短暂空白间隔被引入时,未发生系统的定位错误,这表明效果取决于空间位置整合的关键时间窗,这再次让人联想到saccadic压缩窗口的大小。这些结果进一步证明了继发和面膜引起的误定位和抑制作用的共同机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号