...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Independent mechanisms of spatial attention in visual and tactile working memory
【24h】

Independent mechanisms of spatial attention in visual and tactile working memory

机译:视觉和触觉工作记忆中空间注意力的独立机制

获取原文
           

摘要

Are attention shifts in visual and tactile working memory (WM) controlled by a unitary supramodal mechanism or by separate modality-specific processes? To track the focus of spatial attention during the concurrent maintenance of visual and tactile information, we measured the visual and tactile contralateral delay activity (CDA/tCDA) components in WM tasks where two sample sets (S1 and S2) were presented sequentially. Participants memorized task-relevant target items in both S1 and S2 and judged whether these targets were presented again at memory test. In Experiments 1 and 2, S1 was bimodal and S2 was only presented in the primary modality (vision in Experiment 1, touch in Experiment 2). The primary-modality S1 and S2 targets were located on the same side or on opposite sides (stay versus shift trials, 50% each); participants performed the primary task alone (unimodal baseline) or additionally memorized stimuli of the secondary modality on the same side as the primary-modality S1 targets (bimodal condition). Shifts of attention in the primary modality were reflected by polarity reversals for the respective (visual or tactile) CDA in the period after S2. Critically, such attention shifts in the primary modality had no effect on the amplitudes and polarity of the tCDA/CDA evoked by the secondary-modality S1 targets in bimodal trials, indicating an independence of spatial selection mechanisms for tactile and visual information. In a third experiment, S1 and S2 were both bimodal and stay/shift trials were independently randomized per modality. Attention shifts in either modality reversed the polarity of the corresponding (visual/tactile) CDA, but did not influence the amplitude or polarity of the tCDA/CDA for the other modality. In conclusion, WM maintenance of visual and tactile information recruits spatially selective processes that operate independently and in parallel in both modalities.
机译:视觉和触觉工作记忆(WM)的注意力转移是通过单一的超模态机制还是通过单独的特定于模式的过程控制的?为了在视觉和触觉信息的同时维护期间跟踪空间注意力的焦点,我们测量了WM任务中的视觉和触觉对侧延迟活动(CDA / tCDA)组件,其中依次显示了两个样本集(S1和S2)。参与者在S1和S2中都记住了与任务相关的目标项目,并判断是否在记忆力测试中再次提出了这些目标。在实验1和2中,S1是双峰的,而S2仅以主要形式出现(实验1中的视觉,触摸实验2中的视觉)。主要方式S1和S2目标位于同一侧或相反侧(停留与轮班试验,各50%);参与者单独执行主要任务(单峰基线),或在与主要模态S1目标(双峰条件)相同的一侧另外记忆次要模态的刺激。在S2之后的时期内,各个(视觉或触觉)CDA的极性反转反映了主要方式中的注意力转移。至关重要的是,在双模态试验中,这种主要模式的注意力转移对次级模态S1目标所诱发的tCDA / CDA的幅度和极性没有影响,表明触觉和视觉信息的空间选择机制是独立的。在第三个实验中,S1和S2均为双峰试验,而停留/转移试验分别按每个模态随机分组。两种方式中的注意力转移都会反转相应(视觉/触觉)CDA的极性,但不会影响另一种方式的tCDA / CDA的幅度或极性。总之,视觉和触觉信息的WM维护招募了空间选择性的过程,这些过程在两种方式中均独立且并行运行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号