...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face selective regions
【24h】

Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face selective regions

机译:面部选择区域中动态信息与静态信息的差分选择性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Neuroimaging studies have identified multiple face-selective regions in human cortex but the functional division of labor between these regions is not yet clear. A central hypothesis, with some empirical support, is that face-selective regions in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) are particularly responsive to dynamic information in faces, whereas the fusiform face area (FFA) is more sensitive to the static or invariant properties of faces. Here we quantitatively tested this hypothesis by measuring the magnitude of response in each region to both dynamic and static stimuli. Consistent with the hypothesis, we found that the right FFA and right occipital face area (OFA) responded similarly to movies of faces and to static images of faces from these same movies. By contrast the face-selective region in the right posterior STS (pSTS) responded nearly three times as strongly to dynamic faces as to static faces, and a face-selective region in the right anterior STS (aSTS) responded to dynamic faces only. Both of these regions also responded much more strongly to moving faces than moving bodies, indicating that they are engaged specifically in processing dynamic information from faces, not more generally in processing any dynamic social stimuli. A third face-selective region in the posterior-continuation of the STS (pcSTS) responded similarly to dynamic and static faces. The strong selectivity of face-selective regions in the pSTS and aSTS, but not the FFA, OFA or pcSTS, for dynamic information from faces demonstrates a clear functional dissociation between different face-selective regions, and provides further clues into their function.
机译:神经影像学研究已经确定了人类皮质中的多个面部选择性区域,但是这些区域之间的功能分工尚不明确。有一些经验支持的中心假设是,上颞沟(STS)中的脸部选择区域对脸部中的动态信息特别敏感,而梭形脸部区域(FFA)对牙齿的静态或不变特性更敏感。面孔。在这里,我们通过测量每个区域对动态和静态刺激的响应幅度来定量检验该假设。与该假设一致,我们发现右FFA和右枕面部区域(OFA)对脸部电影和这些电影中脸部静态图像的反应相似。相比之下,右后STS(pSTS)中的脸部选择性区域对动态面部的响应是静态面部的三倍,而右前STS(aSTS)中的脸部选择性区域仅对动态面部的响应。这两个区域对移动的面孔的反应也比移动的身体强烈得多,这表明它们专门用于处理面孔的动态信息,而不是处理任何动态的社会刺激。在STS的后继连续过程中的第三个面部选择区域(pcSTS)对动态和静态面部的反应相似。 pSTS和aSTS中的面部选择性区域对FFA,OFA或pcSTS的强烈选择性对来自面部的动态信息具有很强的选择性,这表明不同的面部选择性区域之间存在明显的功能分离,并为其功能提供了进一步的线索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号