...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >On The Precision of Attention Sets: Effects of Distractor Probability and Temporal Expectations on Contingent Capture
【24h】

On The Precision of Attention Sets: Effects of Distractor Probability and Temporal Expectations on Contingent Capture

机译:注意集的精度:分心概率和时间期望对偶然捕获的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The contingent spatial blink paradigm developed by Folk, Leber, and Egeth (2002) reveals a surprising lack of precision when it comes to our ability to maintain attention goals (sets). A completely irrelevant distractor sharing the color of a target letter in an RSVP (rapid serial visual presentation) stream produces a substantial attention capture effect, even when this distractor is distant from the RSVP stream, and the target's spatial location is central and constant. We examined whether the precision of attention sets can be improved by manipulating participants' expectations. In one experiment, the probability of the target-color-matching distractor was manipulated between groups to appear frequently or infrequently. We hypothesized that participants who encountered the peripheral distractor more frequently would develop a more precise attention set encompassing only the target's location, resulting in less capture. Consistent with this hypothesis, capture effects were smaller when the distractor's occurrence was frequent. We also manipulated the probability of the distractor occurring at a specific location, but found that consistent distractor location did not elicit less capture compared to when the distractor had a chance of occurring at four possible locations. Finally, we examined the possibility of training participants to adopt a temporally narrow attention set. Training involved searching for a target that occurred in the RSVP stream randomly (broad temporal window), or searching for a target that always occurred in the middle of the RSVP sequence (narrow temporal window). However, when participants were transferred to a block of trials in which the target always occurred in the middle of the stream and distractors could appear before or after it, capture effects were equivalent across groups. The present study suggests that experience (i.e., distractor frequency) can modify attention sets, but the precision of attention sets is largely unaffected by temporal and spatial expectations.
机译:Folk,Leber和Egeth(2002)开发的偶然性空间眨眼范式揭示了我们保持注意力目标(集合)的能力令人惊讶地缺乏精确性。在RSVP(快速连续视觉呈现)流中共享目标字母颜色的完全不相关的干扰物会产生实质性的注意力捕获效果,即使该干扰物远离RSVP流且目标的空间位置是中心且恒定的。我们研究了通过操纵参与者的期望是否可以提高注意力集的准确性。在一个实验中,操纵目标颜色匹配干扰物的可能性在组之间频繁出现或不频繁出现。我们假设,更频繁地遇到周边干扰物的参与者会形成更精确的注意力集,其中仅包含目标的位置,从而减少了捕获。与该假设一致,当干扰物频繁发生时,捕获效果较小。我们还操纵了分散器在特定位置发生的可能性,但发现与分散器有机会在四个可能的位置发生时相比,一致的分散器位置不会引起更少的捕获。最后,我们研究了培训参与者采用时间上狭窄的注意力集的可能性。训练涉及随机搜索RSVP流中出现的目标(宽时窗),或搜索总是出现在RSVP序列中间的目标(窄时窗)。但是,当参与者被转移到一个试验组中时,目标总是出现在流的中间,而干扰因素可能出现在目标的前后,则捕获效果在各组中是相同的。本研究表明,经验(即干扰频率)可以改变注意力集,但是注意力集的精度在很大程度上不受时间和空间期望的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号