...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Object-Based Attentional Selection is Affected by Visual Search Strategy
【24h】

Object-Based Attentional Selection is Affected by Visual Search Strategy

机译:基于对象的注意选择受视觉搜索策略的影响

获取原文

摘要

Object-based selective attention is often assumed to spread automatically throughout any object to which attention is cued. However, Shomstein and Yantis (2002, 2004) reported that object-based attentional modulation arises only when the target location is uncertain, suggesting that attention is deployed only to behaviorally relevant locations on the objects. In a previous presentation (VSS, 2006) we extended these findings by showing that contingent attentional capture (Folk et al, 1992) is object-based only when target location is uncertain. Here we examined the role of visual search strategy in object-based attention. Displays contained two rectangles with 5 RSVP streams (one at fixation and one at each end of the two objects). The four peripheral streams contained all gray letters and the central stream was either all gray (Experiment 1) or multicolored (Experiment 2). Subjects were aware that the central stream contained a red target letter (or green for half the subjects) on each trial, which they were to identify. One or two frames prior to target onset, a target-colored or nontarget-colored distracter could appear in one of the peripheral RSVP streams (same or different rectangle). Robust contingent capture was observed in both experiments, but its magnitude differed for distracters on the same versus different objects only in Experiment 1. Furthermore, performance on nontarget-colored distracter trials suggested that subjects used a temporal Singleton Detection Mode (SDM) to detect targets in Experiment 1 and Feature Search Mode (FSM) in Experiment 2 (Bacon & Egeth, 1994). Because FSM requires a more specific definition of the target-defining feature than does SDM, the present data show that uncertainty in the target-defining feature (here, during SDM) can evoke object-based attentional modulation, even when target location is certain. Thus, a more general principle of target uncertainty may guide the allocation of attention to objects.
机译:通常假定基于对象的选择性注意会自动传播到引起注意的任何对象上。但是,Shomstein和Yantis(2002,2004)报告说,只有当目标位置不确定时,才会出现基于对象的注意力调制,这表明注意力仅部署在对象上与行为相关的位置。在先前的演讲(VSS,2006)中,我们通过显示偶然的注意捕获(Folk等,1992)仅在目标位置不确定时才基于对象而扩展了这些发现。在这里,我们研究了视觉搜索策略在基于对象的注意力中的作用。显示包含两个矩形,每个矩形具有5个RSVP流(一个固定,两个对象两端各一个)。四个外围流包含所有灰色字母,而中心流要么全部为灰色(实验1),要么为彩色(实验2)。受试者知道,在每次试验中,中心流都包含一个红色的目标字母(或一半受试者的绿色),以供识别。在目标发作之前一两帧,目标颜色或非目标颜色的干扰物可能会出现在外围RSVP流之一(相同或不同的矩形)中。在两个实验中均观察到了强大的偶然捕获,但仅在实验1中,相同对象与不同对象上的干扰物的大小不同。此外,在非目标有色干扰物试验中的性能表明,受试者使用时间单例检测模式(SDM)来检测目标实验1中的“特征搜索模式(FSM)”和实验2中的特征搜索模式(FSM)(Bacon&Egeth,1994)。由于FSM比SDM需要更详细的目标定义特征定义,因此,当前数据表明,即使在确定目标位置的情况下,目标定义特征(此处为SDM)中的不确定性也可以引起基于对象的注意力调制。因此,目标不确定性的更一般原理可以指导对对象的注意力分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号