首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bacteriology >Porin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with liposomes reconstituted from purified proteins.
【24h】

Porin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with liposomes reconstituted from purified proteins.

机译:大肠杆菌中的孔蛋白通道:用从纯化蛋白重构的脂质体进行的研究。

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Rates of diffusion of uncharged and charged solute molecules through porin channels were determined by using liposomes reconstituted from egg phosphatidylcholine and purified Escherichia coli porins OmpF (protein 1a), OmpC (protein 1b), and PhoE (protein E). All three porin proteins appeared to produce channels of similar size, although the OmpF channel appeared to be 7 to 9% larger than the OmpC and PhoE channels in an equivalent radius. Hydrophobicity of the solute retarded the penetration through all three channels in a similar manner. The presence of one negative charge on the solute resulted in about a threefold reduction in penetration rates through OmpF and OmpC channels, whereas it produced two- to tenfold acceleration of diffusion through the PhoE channel. The addition of the second negatively charged group to the solutes decreased the diffusion rates through OmpF and OmpC channels further, whereas diffusion through the PhoE channel was not affected much. These results suggest that PhoE specializes in the uptake of negatively charged solutes. At the present level of resolution, no sign of true solute specificity was found in OmpF and OmpC channels; peptides, for example, diffused through both of these channels at rates expected from their molecular size, hydrophobicity, and charge. However, the OmpF porin channel allowed influx of more solute molecules per unit time than did the equivalent weight of the OmpC porin when the flux was driven by a concentration gradient of the same size. This apparent difference in "efficiency" became more pronounced with larger solutes, and it is likely to be the consequence of the difference in the sizes of OmpF and OmpC channels.
机译:通过使用从卵磷脂酰胆碱和纯化的大肠杆菌孔蛋白OmpF(蛋白1a),OmpC(蛋白1b)和PhoE(蛋白E)重构的脂质体,确定了通过孔蛋白通道扩散的不带电和带电溶质分子的扩散速率。尽管在相同的半径内OmpF通道比OmpC和PhoE通道大7至9%,但所有三种孔蛋白似乎都产生了相似大小的通道。溶质的疏水性以类似方式阻碍了通过所有三个通道的渗透。溶质上带一个负电荷会导致通过OmpF和OmpC通道的渗透速率降低三倍,而通过PhoE通道的扩散速率则提高了两倍到十倍。向溶质中添加第二个带负电的基团进一步降低了通过OmpF和OmpC通道的扩散速率,而通过PhoE通道的扩散影响不大。这些结果表明,PhoE专门研究带负电荷的溶质。以目前的分辨率水平,在OmpF和OmpC通道中未发现真正的溶质特异性迹象。例如,肽以其分子大小,疏水性和电荷预期的速率通过这两个通道扩散。但是,当通量由相同大小的浓度梯度驱动时,OmpF孔蛋白通道每单位时间流入的溶质分子要多于OmpC孔蛋白的当量重量。对于较大的溶质,这种“效率”上的明显差异变得更加明显,这很可能是OmpF和OmpC通道大小不同的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号