...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >A Comparative Study of Antegrade Air Pyelogram and Retrograde Air Pyelogram for Initial Puncture Access during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy PC01-PC03
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Antegrade Air Pyelogram and Retrograde Air Pyelogram for Initial Puncture Access during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy PC01-PC03

机译:经皮肾镜取石术PC01-PC03初次穿刺的积分气管造影和逆行气管造影的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Access into the collecting system is considered to be the most critical step for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Aim: The present study provides a comparative view into antegrade air pyelography and retrograde air pyelography procedures for percutaneous renal access.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 patients with radiopaque renal calculi indicated for PCNL procedure. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups namely antegrade air pyelogram group (Group I) and retrograde air pyelogram group (Group II). In antegrade air pyelogram group, the collecting system was delineated by targeting the renal stone using a 22 gauge spinal needle where the patients were in the prone position. In another group, the collecting system was delineated by retrograde air pyelogram under fluoroscopy guidance. The method of tract dilatation and stone extraction were the same in both groups for comparison of outcome and complication.Results: The mean age of patients was 41.7±13 and 41.4±13.6 years in Group-I and Group-II respectively. The male to female ratio in Groups I and II was 35/15 (70.00%) and 38/12 (76.00%) respectively. In Group-I the average duration of access was 2.66±1.0 minutes after prone positioning whereas it was recorded to be 19.48±5.0 minutes in Group-II, after lithotomy followed by prone positioning of the patient. Duration of radiation exposure was almost similar in both groups. Additional procedural cost was significantly higher in Group II.Conclusion: Our study indicated that access for PCNL using antegrade air pyelogram can be a cost-effective and acceptable alternative to retrograde air pyelogram with decreased access time.
机译:简介:进入收集系统被认为是经皮肾镜肾切开术(PCNL)的最关键步骤。目的:本研究提供了经皮肾穿刺术的顺行肾盂肾盂造影和逆行肾盂肾盂造影的比较方法。横断面研究针对100例行PCNL手术的不透射线肾结石患者进行。这些患者被随机分为两组,即顺行空气肾盂造影组(I组)和逆行空气肾盂造影组(II组)。在顺行肾盂肾盂造影组中,使用患者的俯卧位的22号脊柱针将肾结石作为目标,勾画出收集系统。在另一组中,在荧光检查指导下,通过逆行空气肾盂造影图描绘了收集系统。结果和并发症的比较,两组的扩张方法和结石取出方法相同。结果:第一组和第二组患者的平均年龄分别为41.7±13岁和41.4±13.6岁。第一组和第二组的男女比例分别为35/15(70.00%)和38/12(76.00%)。在第一组中,平均入路时间为俯卧位后的2.66±1.0分钟,而在第二组中,截石后再进行患者俯卧位后的平均进出时间为19.48±5.0分钟。两组的辐射暴露时间几乎相似。结论:我们的研究表明,使用顺行空中肾盂造影术进入PCNL可以是成本效益高且可接受的替代方案,可缩短逆行肺动脉造影术的进入时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号