...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Randomised Controlled Trial between Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
【24h】

Randomised Controlled Trial between Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

机译:超声引导股神经阻滞和引流管阻滞在前交叉韧带重建术后疼痛和功能预后之间的随机对照试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) is used as an adjunct to postoperative analgesia in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgeries. However, it causes a reduction in quadriceps strength following use. To mitigate the loss in muscle function and patient safety, surgeons and anaesthesiologists have recently been exploring the potential benefits of a motor sparing Adductor Canal Nerve Blockade (ACB). To date, few comparative studies exist to determine its clinical utility.Aim: To compare the efficacy of femoral nerve block versus ACB for postoperative pain and functional outcome in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomised controlled trial was done after approval from Institutional Ethics Committee, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, 76 ASA Class 1 and 2 patients posted for ACL reconstruction, aged 18-60 years were chosen after consent and were randomised into two groups using computer-generated block randomisation. Group F received femoral nerve block and Group A received adductor canal block postoperatively. Visual analogue scale score at 0, 12 and 24 hours and Medical Research Council grading at 2, 12 and 24 hours post-block were measured and compared between both groups. Data analysis was done using student unpaired t-test, student paired t-test and chi-square test.Results: Visual analogue scale scores at 0, 12 and 24 hours postoperative was 2.29, 3.26 and 3.86 in Group A and 2.59, 3.61 and 4.49 in Group F (statistically non significant). Average time for rescue analgesia was 1 hour and 8 hours in Group A and F respectively. Medical research council grading 2, 12 and 24 hours postoperative was 2.6, 4.09 and 4.77 in Group A and 2.8, 3.15 and 4.05 in Group F (statistically significant).Conclusion: Compared with femoral nerve block, the study suggests that adductor canal block preserves quadriceps strength but is equianalgesic for patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
机译:在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建手术中,股神经阻滞(FNB)被用作术后镇痛的辅助手段。但是,使用后会导致股四头肌强度降低。为了减轻肌肉功能和患者安全的损失,外科医生和麻醉师最近一直在探索保留备用运动的“ Adductor运河神经阻断”(ACB)的潜在益处。迄今为止,尚无确定其临床实用性的比较研究。目的:比较股神经阻滞和ACB对ACL重建患者术后疼痛和功能结局的疗效。材料与方法:这种前瞻性研究经印度卡纳塔克邦芒格洛卡斯图尔巴医学院机构伦理委员会批准后,进行了随机对照试验,共有76例ASA 1级和2级ASA患者经ACL重建,经同意后选择年龄18-60岁,并随机分为两组。计算机生成的块随机化。 F组在术后接受股神经阻滞,A组接受内收肌阻滞。两组均在阻塞后0、12和24小时进行视觉模拟量表评分,并在阻塞后2、12和24小时对医学研究委员会评分。使用学生非配对t检验,学生配对t检验和卡方检验进行数据分析。结果:A组和2.59组术后0、12和24小时的视觉模拟量表得分分别为2.29、3.26和3.86。 ,F组中的3.61和4.49(统计意义不显着)。 A组和F组的平均镇痛时间分别为1小时和8小时。医学研究委员会对A组术后2、12和24小时的评分分别为2.6、4.09和4.77,F组为2.8、3.15和4.05(具有统计学意义)。结论:与股神经阻滞相比,研究表明内收肌根管阻滞保留了股四头肌的强度,但对进行前交叉韧带重建的患者具有镇痛作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号