...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Efficacy of Dental Floss and Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse as an Adjunct to Toothbrushing in Removing Plaque and Gingival Inflammation? A Three Way Cross Over Trial
【24h】

Efficacy of Dental Floss and Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse as an Adjunct to Toothbrushing in Removing Plaque and Gingival Inflammation? A Three Way Cross Over Trial

机译:牙线和洗必泰漱口水作为牙刷清除牙菌斑和牙龈发炎的辅助功效?三路交叉试用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Maintaining good oral hygiene is important to combat periodontal diseases. The use of tooth brush alone does not serve the purpose of removing plaque which demands the use of some adjuncts such as proximal cleaning aids.Aim: The study was conducted to compare the efficacy of Dental Floss and 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthrinse as an adjunct to toothbrushing on plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation.Settings and Design: Department of Public Health Dentistry, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India. This was a randomized, double blind, three-way cross over clinical trial.Materials and Methods: Forty five dental students in the age group of 19-25yr. were enrolled into the study. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups (n=15) i.e. Group A? Toothbrushing with Dental floss (TB+DF), Group B? Toothbrushing with 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthrinse (TB+CHX-MR) and Group C? Toothbrushing alone (TB Alone) in a three-way crossover manner. After 21d of trial period, plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were assessed for each group, oral prophylaxis followed by a washout period for 14d. Statistical Analysis used: Mean, standard deviations and p-values were obtained. ANOVA test was used to compare the intergroup difference and Post hoc test to compare between the two groups.Results: The inter-group comparison for GI and PI at all interventions showed statistically significant difference (p<0.001). While comparing between group A and group C at second and third follow up, no significant difference were observed though group A showed reduction in mean values for both the clinical parameters whereas while comparing between group A and group B, statistically significant difference was observed, which is in line when compared with group B and group C. The Group B showed more reduction in plaque and gingival scores which was found to be statistically significant (p<0.001).Conclusion: CHX-MR when used as an adjunct to toothbrushing is more effective in the reduction of plaque and gingival scores than a toothbrush alone or in combination with DF.
机译:背景:保持良好的口腔卫生对战胜牙周疾病至关重要。单独使用牙刷并不能达到去除牙菌斑的目的,而需要使用一些清洁剂如近端清洁剂。目的:进行本研究以比较牙线和0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定漱口水作为口腔清洁剂的功效。设置与设计:印度莫拉达巴德Kothiwal牙科学院和研究中心公共卫生部。这是一项随机,双盲,三方交叉临床试验。材料与方法:19-25岁年龄段的45名牙科学生。被纳入研究。将受试者随机分为三组(n = 15),即A组? B组含牙线(TB + DF)的牙刷?用0.12%的葡萄糖酸洗必太漱口水(TB + CHX-MR)和C组进行牙刷?以三向交叉方式单独刷牙(单独使用TB)。在试验期21天后,评估每组的牙菌斑指数(PI)和牙龈指数(GI),进行口服预防,然后进行14天的冲洗期。使用的统计分析:获得平均值,标准偏差和p值。结果:两组间GI和PI的组间比较在统计学上有显着性差异(p <0.001)。在第二和第三次随访中比较A组和C组时,尽管A组的两个临床指标均降低,但未观察到显着差异;而A组和B组之间的比较时,观察到统计学上的显着差异,与B组和C组比较,结果一致。B组的牙菌斑和牙龈评分降低幅度更大,具有统计学意义(p <0.001)。结论:CHX-MR用作牙刷的辅助剂时,其作用更大。与单独使用或与DF组合使用牙刷相比,可有效减少牙菌斑和牙龈分数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号