首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Efficacy of Dental Floss and Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse as an Adjunct to Toothbrushing in Removing Plaque and Gingival Inflammation – A Three Way Cross Over Trial
【2h】

Efficacy of Dental Floss and Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse as an Adjunct to Toothbrushing in Removing Plaque and Gingival Inflammation – A Three Way Cross Over Trial

机译:牙线和洗必泰漱口水作为牙刷去除牙菌斑和牙龈炎的辅助剂的功效–三步交叉试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Maintaining good oral hygiene is important to combat periodontal diseases. The use of tooth brush alone does not serve the purpose of removing plaque which demands the use of some adjuncts such as proximal cleaning aids.>Aim: The study was conducted to compare the efficacy of Dental Floss and 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthrinse as an adjunct to toothbrushing on plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation.>Settings and Design: Department of Public Health Dentistry, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India. This was a randomized, double blind, three-way cross over clinical trial.>Materials and Methods: Forty five dental students in the age group of 19-25yr. were enrolled into the study. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups (n=15) i.e. Group A– Toothbrushing with Dental floss (TB+DF), Group B– Toothbrushing with 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthrinse (TB+CHX-MR) and Group C– Toothbrushing alone (TB Alone) in a three-way crossover manner. After 21 d of trial period, plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were assessed for each group, oral prophylaxis followed by a washout period for 14d.>Statistical Analysis used: Mean, standard deviations and p-values were obtained. ANOVA test was used to compare the intergroup difference and Post hoc test to compare between the two groups.>Results: The inter-group comparison for GI and PI at all interventions showed statistically significant difference (p<0.001). While comparing between group A and group C at second and third follow up, no significant difference were observed though group A showed reduction in mean values for both the clinical parameters whereas while comparing between group A and group B, statistically significant difference was observed, which is in line when compared with group B and group C. The Group B showed more reduction in plaque and gingival scores which was found to be statistically significant (p<0.001).>Conclusion: CHX-MR when used as an adjunct to toothbrushing is more effective in the reduction of plaque and gingival scores than a toothbrush alone or in combination with DF.
机译:>背景:保持良好的口腔卫生对战胜牙周疾病至关重要。单独使用牙刷并不能达到去除牙菌斑的目的,而这需要使用一些辅助工具,例如近端清洁辅助剂。>目的:该研究旨在比较牙线和0.12%的牙线的功效葡萄糖酸氯己定漱口水可作为牙刷对牙菌斑积聚和牙龈发炎的辅助作用。>设置和设计:印度莫拉达巴德Kothiwal牙科学院和研究中心公共卫生部。这是一项随机,双盲,三方交叉临床试验。>材料和方法:年龄在19-25岁之间的45位牙科学生。被纳入研究。将受试者随机分为三组(n = 15),即A组–牙线牙刷(TB + DF),B组–含0.12%葡萄糖酸洗必泰漱口水的牙刷(TB + CHX-MR)和C组–单独刷牙( TB Alone)以三种方式交叉。在试验期21天后,评估每组的牙菌斑指数(PI)和牙龈指数(GI),进行口服预防,然后进行14天的清除期。>统计分析:均值,标准差和获得p值。 >结果:在所有干预措施中,GI和PI的组间比较均显示出统计学上的显着差异(p <0.001) 。在第二和第三次随访时比较A组和C组之间,尽管A组的两个临床指标均降低,但未观察到显着差异,而A组和B组之间的比较则具有统计学上的显着差异,与B组和C组比较,结果一致。B组的牙菌斑和牙龈评分下降幅度更大,具有统计学意义(p <0.001)。>结论:使用CHX-MR与单独使用牙刷或与DF组合使用牙刷相比,使用牙刷作为牙刷的附件在减少牙菌斑和牙龈分数方面更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号