首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >FNAC Versus Core Needle Biopsy: A Comparative Study in Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lump
【24h】

FNAC Versus Core Needle Biopsy: A Comparative Study in Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lump

机译:FNAC与核心针穿刺活检:可触及的乳房肿块评估的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Breast carcinoma is the most common malignant tumour and the leading cause of carcinoma death in women in world. The main purpose of FNAC or CNB of breast lumps is to confirm cancer preoperatively and to avoid unnecessary surgery in specific benign conditions. Aims and Objective: The objective of the study was to compare between Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and Core Needle Biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma with final histological diagnosis from excision specimen as it is gold standard. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was done on 50 cases. Patients undergoing all three procedures (Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy done at Department of Pathology; subsequent excision surgeries done at Department of General Surgery) were selected. May Grunwald Giemsa (MGG) and Papaniculou (PAP) staining were performed on cytology smears. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining was done on both the CNB and tissue specimens obtained from subsequent excision surgeries to see the histological features. Results: FNAC showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 69%, 100%, 100%, 38.1%, and 74% respectively in diagnosing carcinoma. CNB had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of 88.3%, 100%, 100%, 53.3% and 86%. Both FNAC and CNB showed statistically significant correlation with confirmatory HPE of excision specimen (p-value <0.05) in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a rapid, less complicated, economical, reliable and relevant method for the preoperative pathological diagnosis of breast carcinoma in a developing nation like ours. If the initial FNAC is inadequate, core needle biopsy (CNB) can be a useful second line method of pathological diagnosis in order to minimize the chance of missed diagnosis of breast cancer.
机译:简介:乳腺癌是世界上最常见的恶性肿瘤,也是导致女性死亡的主要原因。 FNAC或CNB乳腺肿块的主要目的是在术前确认癌症并避免在特定的良性状况下进行不必要的手术。目的和目的:本研究的目的是比较细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)和核心针穿刺活检(CNB)在乳腺癌的诊断中的作用,并根据切除标本进行最终的组织学诊断,因为它是金标准。材料与方法:对50例病例进行了前瞻性研究。选择接受全部三种手术(在病理科进行细针穿刺细胞学和核心针穿刺活检;随后在普通外科进行的切除手术)的患者。在细胞学涂片上进行May Grunwald Giemsa(MGG)和Papaniculou(PAP)染色。苏木和曙红(H&E)染色在CNB和随后的切除手术中获得的组织标本上进行,以观察组织学特征。结果:FNAC在诊断癌症中的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别为69%,100%,100%,38.1%和74%。 CNB的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别为88.3%,100%,100%,53.3%和86%。在乳腺癌的诊断中,FNAC和CNB与切除标本的确证HPE均具有统计学显着相关性(p值<0.05)。结论:在我们这样的发展中国家,细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是一种快速,简便,经济,可靠且相关的乳腺癌术前病理诊断方法。如果最初的FNAC不足,则核心穿刺活检(CNB)可以作为病理诊断的有用的第二线方法,以最大程度地减少错过诊断乳腺癌的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号