...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >A Comparative Clinical Study of the Docetaxel-Carboplatin combination and the Gemcitabine- Carboplatin combination in Patients with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
【24h】

A Comparative Clinical Study of the Docetaxel-Carboplatin combination and the Gemcitabine- Carboplatin combination in Patients with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

机译:非小细胞肺癌患者中多西他赛-卡铂联合和吉西他滨-卡铂联合的比较临床研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Back Ground: Non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes about 75-80% of all lung cancer cases. In the chemotherapy of NSCLC, a platinum drug can be combined with taxanes or Gemcitabine. Aim: To compare the Docetaxel-Carboplatin (DC) and Gemcitabine-Carboplatin (GC) treatment regimen in patients with NSCLC.Setting And Design: Prospective, Randomized, Open labeled double arm studyMethods: Thirty patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomly divided into two groups. The patients of the DC group were treated with Docetaxel (75 mg/m2, day one) and Carboplatin (calculated to give an AUC of 6 mg/ml, day one) and those of the GC group were treated with Gemcitabine (1200 mg/m2, day one and eight) and Carboplatin (day one). Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a period of three cycles. Response and toxicity were assessed using WHO criteria.Results: The patients in both the groups were well balanced for demographics and disease. Objective responses were similar in the two groups; DC group: 20% partial response, 60% stable disease and 20% of progressive disease. GC group: 33.3% partial response, 53.3% stable disease and 13.3% progressive disease. The only significant toxicity was anemia in the DC group. The evaluation of the quality of life of patients in both the groups showed significant change in the incidence of anemia, dysphagia and peripheral neuropathy in the DC group. Alopecia was significantly higher among the patients of the GC group.Conclusion: The toxicity profiles of the Docetaxel-Carboplatin and Gemcitabine- Carboplatin combinations were similar. The Docetaxel-Carboplatin treatment regimen is cost effective for patients. Global quality of health is not improved in either combination, although advantages in some components of ten QOL were apparent.
机译:背景:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)约占所有肺癌病例的75-80%。在非小细胞肺癌的化学治疗中,铂类药物可与紫杉烷类或吉西他滨联用。目的:比较非小细胞肺癌患者的多西他赛-卡铂(DC)和吉西他滨-卡铂(GC)治疗方案。设置与设计:前瞻性,随机,开放标签的双臂研究方法:将30例IIIB / IV期NSCLC患者随机分组分为两组DC组的患者接受多西他赛(75 mg / m2,第一天)和卡铂(计算得出的AUC为6 mg / ml,第一天),而GC组的患者则接受吉西他滨(1200 mg / m2)。平方米,第一天和第八天)和卡铂(第一天)。每21天重复一次治疗周期,共三个周期。结果:两组患者在人口统计学和疾病方面均保持平衡。两组的客观反应相似。 DC组:部分反应20%,稳定疾病60%和进行性疾病20%。 GC组:部分反应33.3%,稳定疾病53.3%,进行性疾病13.3%。 DC组中唯一显着的毒性反应是贫血。两组患者的生活质量评估显示,DC组贫血,吞咽困难和周围神经病变的发生率发生了显着变化。结论:多西他赛-卡铂和吉西他滨-卡铂联合用药的毒性特征相似。多西他赛-卡铂治疗方案对患者而言具有成本效益。尽管十个QOL的某些组成部分都有明显的优势,但两种组合都无法改善总体健康水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号