...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Controlled Performance Evaluation of the DiversiLab Repetitive-Sequence-Based Genotyping System for Typing Multidrug-Resistant Health Care-Associated Bacterial Pathogens
【24h】

Controlled Performance Evaluation of the DiversiLab Repetitive-Sequence-Based Genotyping System for Typing Multidrug-Resistant Health Care-Associated Bacterial Pathogens

机译:基于DiversiLab重复序列的基因分型系统对耐多药保健相关细菌病原菌进行分型的控制性能评估

获取原文

摘要

Fast, reliable, and versatile typing tools are essential to differentiate among related bacterial strains for epidemiological investigation and surveillance of health care-associated infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. The DiversiLab (DL) system is a semiautomated repetitive-sequence-based PCR system designed for rapid genotyping. The DL system performance was assessed by comparing its reproducibility, typeability, discriminatory power, and concordance with those of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and by assessing its epidemiological concordance on well-characterized MDR bacterial strains (n = 165). These included vanA Enterococcus faecium, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter baumannii, and ESBL- or metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. The DL system showed very good performance for E. faecium and K. pneumoniae and good performance for other species, except for a discrimination index of <95% for A. baumannii and E. coli (93.9% and 93.5%, respectively) and incomplete concordance with MLST for P. aeruginosa (78.6%) and E. coli (97.0%). Occasional violations of MLST assignment by DL types were noted for E. coli. Complete epidemiological concordance was observed for all pathogens, as all outbreak-associated strains clustered in identical DL types that were distinct from those of unrelated strains. In conclusion, the DL system showed good to excellent performance, making it a reliable typing tool for investigation of outbreaks caused by study pathogens, even though it was generally less discriminating than PFGE analysis. For E. coli and P. aeruginosa, MLST cannot be reliably inferred from DL type due to phylogenetic group violation or discordance.
机译:快速,可靠和通用的键入工具对于区分相关细菌菌株以进行流行病学调查和监视与多药耐药(MDR)病原体的医疗保健相关感染至关重要。 DiversiLab(DL)系统是一种基于半自动重复序列的PCR系统,旨在进行快速基因分型。通过比较其重复性,可打字性,区分能力和与脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)和多位点序列分型(MLST)的一致性以及评估其在特征明确的MDR细菌菌株上的流行病学一致性来评估DL系统的性能( n = 165)。这些包括 vanA肠球菌,产宽谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肺炎克雷伯菌,大肠杆菌和鲍曼不动杆菌菌株,以及产ESBL或金属-β-内酰胺酶(MBL)的菌株铜绿假单胞菌菌株。 DL系统对粪肠球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌表现出非常好的性能,对其他物种表现良好,但鲍曼不动杆菌和大肠杆菌的鉴别指数<95%(分别为93.9%和93.5%)且不完整与铜绿假单胞菌(78.6%)和大肠杆菌(97.0%)的MLST一致。大肠杆菌中偶尔会违反DL类型指定的MLST。观察到所有病原体的完全流行病学一致性,因为所有与暴发相关的菌株都聚集在相同的DL类型中,这与不相关的菌株不同。总之,尽管DL系统通常不如PFGE分析那样具有鉴别力,但DL系统表现出优异的性能,使其成为调查由研究病原体引起的暴发的可靠打字工具。对于大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌,由于系统发生族群违背或不一致,不能从DL型可靠地推断MLST。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号