首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Gen-Probe Transcription-Mediated Amplification, Abbott PCR, and Roche PCR Assays for Detection of Wild-Type and Mutant Plasmid Strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden
【24h】

Comparison of Gen-Probe Transcription-Mediated Amplification, Abbott PCR, and Roche PCR Assays for Detection of Wild-Type and Mutant Plasmid Strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden

机译:Gen-Probe转录介导的扩增,Abbott PCR和Roche PCR检测用于检测沙眼衣原体野生型和突变质粒菌株的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The clinical performance of two nucleic acid amplification assays targeting the cryptic plasmid and two assays targeting rRNA molecules in Chlamydia trachomatis was examined. First-catch urine samples from Malmoe, Sweden, were tested for C. trachomatis with the Abbott real-time PCR assay m2000 and an in-house PCR for the new variant strain of C. trachomatis with a deletion in the cryptic plasmid. Aliquots of the urine samples were sent to Aarhus, Denmark, and further examined with the Roche COBAS Amplicor CT (RCA) PCR, the Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay (AC2) targeting the C. trachomatis 23S rRNA, and the Aptima C. trachomatis assay (ACT) targeting the 16S rRNA molecule. A positive prevalence of 9% (163/1,808 urine samples examined) was detected according to the combined reference standard. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the four assays were as follows: for ACT, 100% (163/163) and 99.9% (1,643/1,645), respectively; for AC2, 100% (163/163) and 99.6% (1,640/1,645); for m2000, 68.7% (112/163) and 99.9% (1,644/1,645); for RCA, 63.8% (104/163) and 99.9% (1,643/1,645). The two Gen-Probe assays detected all mutant strains characterized by the in-house PCR as having the deletion in the cryptic plasmid, whereas the Roche and the Abbott PCRs targeting the plasmid were both unable to detect the plasmid mutant. The difference in clinical sensitivity between the plasmid PCR assays m2000 and RCA, on the one hand, and the rRNA assays AC2 and ACT, on the other, could be attributed almost exclusively to the presence of the plasmid mutant in about one-quarter of the Chlamydia-positive samples examined.
机译:在沙眼衣原体中检测了两种针对隐性质粒的核酸扩增检测方法和针对rRNA分子的两种检测方法的临床性能。对来自瑞典马尔默的首批尿液样本进行了 C测试。沙眼,使用雅培实时荧光定量PCR检测m2000和内部PCR检测新的 C变异株。沙眼衣原体,其中隐含质粒缺失。将尿液样品的等分试样发送到丹麦的奥胡斯,并进一步用Roche COBAS Amplicor CT(RCA)PCR,针对C的Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2分析(AC2)进行检查。沙眼 23S rRNA和Aptima C。靶向16S rRNA分子的沙眼检测法(ACT)。根据合并的参考标准,检出率为9%(检查的尿液样本为163 / 1,808),阳性率为9%。四种测定的临床敏感性和特异性如下:对于ACT,分别为100%(163/163)和99.9%(1,643 / 1,645)。对于AC2,分别为100%(163/163)和99.6%(1,640 / 1,645);对于m2000,分别为68.7%(112/163)和99.9%(1,644 / 1,645); RCA分别为63.8%(104/163)和99.9%(1,643 / 1,645)。两种Gen-Probe分析均检测到所有以内部PCR为特征的突变菌株,其中隐性质粒中有缺失,而靶向该质粒的Roche和Abbott PCR均无法检测到该质粒突变。一方面,质粒PCR分析方法m2000和RCA与rRNA分析方法AC2和ACT之间的临床敏感性差异几乎可以完全归因于质粒突变体中大约四分之一的存在。检查了衣原体阳性样本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号