...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of In-House Real-Time Quantitative PCR to the Adenovirus R-Gene Kit for Determination of Adenovirus Load in Clinical Samples
【24h】

Comparison of In-House Real-Time Quantitative PCR to the Adenovirus R-Gene Kit for Determination of Adenovirus Load in Clinical Samples

机译:室内实时定量PCR与腺病毒R基因试剂盒用于测定临床样品中腺病毒载量的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In the context of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, adenovirus infections are associated with relevant mortality and morbidity. Detection of adenovirus DNA by quantitative PCR is the “gold standard” for these patients. A total of 150 samples, namely, 78 whole-blood, 22 cerebrospinal fluid, 24 digestive biopsy, and 26 stool samples, from 29 patients, including 24 hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, were tested for the detection of adenovirus using an in-house real-time quantitative PCR assay (A. Heim, C. Ebnet, G. Harste, and P. Pring-Akerblom, J. Med. Virol. 70:228-239, 2003) and the commercially available Adenovirus R-Gene kit. Adenovirus DNA was automatically isolated from whole-blood samples (Magna Pure LC system; Roche) or was manually extracted from other specimens (QIAamp; Qiagen) using the appropriate kit. The intra- and interassay reproducibilities and sensitivities were evaluated with cell culture supernatant dilutions. Of the 150 samples tested, 86 were found to be positive and 55 were found to be negative using both techniques. Nine (6%) discordant results were obtained. In most cases, discrepant results concerned samples with low viral loads. Quantitative results for all concordant positive samples were analyzed using the Spearman correlation test. A good correlation between the results of the in-house assay and those of the kit assay was obtained (r = 0.95; P < 0.001). Regarding the threshold cycle value for internal control spiked samples, none of the 150 samples tested contained a PCR inhibitor. In conclusion, a relevant correlation of results between the in-house assay and the kit assay, as well as the high-quality reproducibility and sensitivity of the kit assay, warranted its use for follow-up of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.
机译:在造血干细胞移植的情况下,腺病毒感染与相关的死亡率和发病率有关。通过定量PCR检测腺病毒DNA是这些患者的“金标准”。使用内部方法,对来自29位患者(包括24位造血干细胞移植受者)的150份样本(即78份全血,22份脑脊液,24份活检组织和26份粪便样本)进行了检测,以检测腺病毒。实时定量PCR分析(A. Heim,C.Ebnet,G.Harste和P.Pring-Akerblom,J.Med.Virol.70:228-239,2003)和市售的腺病毒R-Gene试剂盒。从全血样本(Magna Pure LC系统; Roche)中自动分离腺病毒DNA,或使用适当的试剂盒从其他样本中手动提取(QIAamp; Qiagen)。用细胞培养上清液稀释液评估测定内和测定间的再现性和敏感性。使用这两种技术,在测试的150个样本中,发现86个为阳性,发现55个为阴性。获得了九个(6%)不一致的结果。在大多数情况下,结果差异与病毒载量低有关。使用Spearman相关检验分析所有一致阳性样品的定量结果。内部分析结果与试剂盒分析结果之间具有良好的相关性( r = 0.95; P <0.001)。关于内部对照加标样品的阈值循环值,测试的150个样品中没有一个包含PCR抑制剂。总之,内部测定与试剂盒测定之间结果的相关性以及试剂盒测定的高质量再现性和敏感性保证了其可用于造血干细胞移植接受者的随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号