...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Utility of Galactomannan Enzyme Immunoassay and (1,3) β-d-Glucan in Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections: Low Sensitivity for Aspergillus fumigatus Infection in Hematologic Malignancy Patients
【24h】

Utility of Galactomannan Enzyme Immunoassay and (1,3) β-d-Glucan in Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections: Low Sensitivity for Aspergillus fumigatus Infection in Hematologic Malignancy Patients

机译:半乳甘露聚糖酶免疫测定法和(1,3)β-d-葡聚糖在侵袭性真菌感染诊断中的应用:血液恶性肿瘤患者对烟曲霉感染的敏感性较低

获取原文
           

摘要

Previous studies have reported that galactomannan (GM) enzyme immunoassay and 1,3 beta-glucan (BG) assay may be useful diagnostic tools, but their sensitivities are variable. We compared the performances of both tests. Between October 2002 and May 2005, 82 patients were prospectively monitored for 12 weeks. A total of 414 samples were tested by GM assay and 409 samples were tested by BG assay for the following four groups of patients: those with invasive aspergillosis (IA), those with other mold infections (Fusarium, scedosporium, zygomycosis, etc.), those with candidemia, and control patients. Blood samples were obtained twice on week 1 and once every other week for a total of 12 weeks. Patients in the invasive fungal infection groups had comparable risk factors. The sensitivity of the GM test was significantly higher for patients with IA due to non-fumigatus Aspergillus species than for patients with IA due to Aspergillus fumigatus (49% versus 13%; P < 0.0001) or with other mold infections (49% versus 6%; P < 0.0001). However, the sensitivity range (47% to 64%) and specificity (88%) of the BG assay were comparable among all patients tested, regardless of the infecting pathogen. The performance of GM-based diagnosis appears to be better for detecting non-fumigatus Aspergillus species. The diagnostic marker BG was shown to have a higher sensitivity than that of GM in detecting IA and other mold infections in hematologic malignancy patients.
机译:先前的研究报告称,半乳甘露聚糖(GM)酶免疫测定法和1,3β-葡聚糖(BG)测定法可能是有用的诊断工具,但它们的敏感性是可变的。我们比较了两个测试的性能。在2002年10月至2005年5月之间,对82例患者进行了为期12周的前瞻性监测。 GM组共检测414个样品,BG组共检测409个样品,用于以下四组患者:侵袭性曲霉病(IA),其他霉菌感染的患者( Fusarium ,scedosporium ,合子菌病等),患有念珠菌血症的人和对照患者。在第1周两次采集血样,每隔一周采集一次血样,共12周。侵入性真菌感染组的患者具有可比的危险因素。非烟曲霉菌引起的IA患者的GM试验的敏感性明显高于烟曲霉菌引起的IA患者的GM试验的敏感性(49%比13%; P <0.0001)或其他霉菌感染(49%比6%; P <0.0001)。但是,无论感染病原体如何,在所有接受测试的患者中,BG测定的灵敏度范围(47%至64%)和特异性(88%)都是可比的。基于转基因的诊断方法似乎可以更好地检测非烟曲霉菌。在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中,诊断标记物BG在检测IA和其他霉菌感染方面比GM具有更高的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号