首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
【24h】

Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

机译:用于识别厌氧细菌的PRAS II,AN-Ident和RapID-ANA系统的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

Two rapid systems for the identification of anaerobes were compared to a conventional growth system aided by a computer. The rapid systems (AN-Ident and RapID-ANA) are non-growth-dependent micromethods that identify anaerobes in 4 h by the action of various constitutive enzymes on chromogenic substrates. The organisms tested were 98 anaerobes, most of which were clinical isolates. The AN-Ident system identified 76 of these to species level and 86 to genus level; the RapID-ANA system correctly identified 74 of the organisms to species level and identified 93 to genus level. The PRAS II system correctly identified 77 to species level and 96 to genus level. In most instances, adequate identification could be obtained with either of the two rapid systems, but the conventional PRAS II system remains the most accurate.
机译:将两种用于鉴定厌氧菌的快速系统与通过计算机辅助的常规生长系统进行了比较。快速系统(AN-Ident和RapID-ANA)是非生长相关的微方法,可通过生色底物上各种组成性酶的作用在4小时内识别厌氧菌。测试的生物是98种厌氧菌,其中大多数是临床分离株。 AN-Ident系统识别出其中的76种属于物种水平,而86种属于属水平。 RapID-ANA系统正确地将74种生物识别到物种水平,将93种生物识别到属水平。 PRAS II系统正确地确定了77种属和96种属。在大多数情况下,可以使用两个快速系统中的任何一个进行足够的识别,但是常规PRAS II系统仍然是最准确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号